Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29119422›Full record

SynthesisJournal of occupational rehabilitation2017

Supported Decision-Making: Implications from Positive Psychology for Assessment and Intervention in Rehabilitation and Employment.

Hatice Uyanik, Karrie A Shogren, Peter Blanck

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of occupational rehabilitation, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. On the Importance of the Americans with Disabilities Act at 30.Journal of disability policy studies · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Hatice UyanikDepartment of Special Education, University of Kansas, Joseph R. Pearson Hall, 1122 West Campus Road, Rm. 517, Lawrence, KS, 66045, USA. huyanik@ku.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5088-5714
Karrie A ShogrenDepartment of Special Education, University of Kansas, Joseph R. Pearson Hall, 1122 West Campus Road, Rm. 517, Lawrence, KS, 66045, USA.
Peter BlanckBurton Blatt Institute, Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY, USA.

Funding

Administration for Community Living #90DM0001-01-00National Institute on Disability, Independent Living, and Rehabilitation Research #90DP0076National Institute on Disability, Independent Living, and Rehabilitation Research 90DP0076-01-00National Institute on Disability, Independent Living, and Rehabilitation Research #90DP0090-01-00National Institute on Disability, Independent Living, and Rehabilitation Research # H133A120008
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose This article reviews existing literature on positive psychology, supported decision-making (SDM), employment, and disability. It examines interventions and assessments that have been empirically evaluated for the enhancement of decision-making and overall well-being of people with disabilities. Additionally, conceptual themes present in the literature were explored. Methods A systematic review was conducted across two databases (ERIC and PsychINFO) using various combination of keywords of 'disabilit*', work rehabilitation and employment terms, positive psychology terms, and SDM components. Seven database searches were conducted with diverse combinations of keywords, which identified 1425 results in total to be screened for relevance using their titles and abstracts. Database search was supplemented with hand searches of oft-cited journals, ancestral search, and supplemental search from grey literature. Results Only four studies were identified in the literature targeting SDM and positive psychology related constructs in the employment and job development context. Results across the studies indicated small to moderate impacts of the assessment and interventions on decision-making and engagement outcomes. Conceptually there are thematic areas of potential overlap, although they are limited in the explicit integration of theory in supported decision-making, positive psychology, disability, and employment. Conclusion Results suggest a need for additional scholarship in this area that focuses on theory development and integration as well as empirical work. Such work should examine the potential utility of considering positive psychological interventions when planning for SDM in the context of career development activities to enhance positive outcomes related to decision-making, self-determination, and other positive psychological constructs.

Indexed as

Decision MakingEmploymentCounselingHumansOccupational Health ServicesPersons with DisabilitiesSocial LearningWork Capacity EvaluationDisabilityEmploymentPositive psychologyRehabilitationSupported decision-making

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.