Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29119289›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of colorectal disease2018

Local antibiotic decontamination to prevent anastomotic leakage short-term outcome in rectal cancer surgery.

Ulrich Wirth, Susanne Rogers, Kristina Haubensak, Stefan Schopf, Thomas von Ahnen, Hans Martin Schardey

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of colorectal disease, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. The Influence of the Microbiome on Anastomotic Leak.Clinics in colon and rectal surgery · 2023
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Anastomotic Leak: Toward an Understanding of Its Root Causes.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2021
    Review
  10. Influence of the Microbiome on Anastomotic Leak.Clinics in colon and rectal surgery · 2021
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Involvement of the Commensal OrganismSurgical infections · 2020
    Article
  15. The use of oral antibiotics and mechanical bowel preparation in elective colorectal resection for the reduction of surgical site infection.Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland · 2020
    Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ulrich WirthDepartment of General, Visceral and Vascular Surgery, Agatharied Hospital, Norbert-Kerkel-Platz, 83734, Hausham, Germany. Ulrich.Wirth@med.uni-muenchen.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2366-8524
Susanne RogersDepartment of General, Visceral and Vascular Surgery, Agatharied Hospital, Norbert-Kerkel-Platz, 83734, Hausham, Germany.
Kristina HaubensakDepartment of General, Visceral and Vascular Surgery, Agatharied Hospital, Norbert-Kerkel-Platz, 83734, Hausham, Germany.
Stefan SchopfDepartment of General, Visceral and Vascular Surgery, Agatharied Hospital, Norbert-Kerkel-Platz, 83734, Hausham, Germany.
Thomas von AhnenDepartment of General, Visceral and Vascular Surgery, Agatharied Hospital, Norbert-Kerkel-Platz, 83734, Hausham, Germany.
Hans Martin SchardeyDepartment of General, Visceral and Vascular Surgery, Agatharied Hospital, Norbert-Kerkel-Platz, 83734, Hausham, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAnastomotic leakage still presents an issue in rectal cancer surgery with rates of about 11%. As bacteria play a critical role, there is the concept of perioperative local decontamination to prevent anastomotic leakage.

methodsTo ascertain the effectiveness of this treatment, we performed a retrospective analysis on 206 rectal resections with primary anastomosis and routine use of a selective decontamination of the digestive tract (SDD) regimen for local decontamination. SDD medication was administered every 8 h from the day before surgery to the seventh postoperative day. All patients were treated according to the fast-track protocol without mechanical bowel preparation; instead, a laxative was used.

resultsOverall morbidity was 30%, overall mortality 0.5%. In our data, overall rate of anastomotic leakage (AL) was 5.8%, with 3.9% in anterior rectal resection and 6.5% in low anterior rectal resection group. In 75% of cases, anastomotic leakage was grade "C" and needed re-laparotomy. Surgical site infection rate was 19.9%. No serious adverse events were related to decontamination.

conclusionLocal antibiotic decontamination appears to be safe and effective to decrease the rate of anastomotic leakage in rectal cancer surgery. Further focus should be on perioperative management including bowel preparation and choice of antimicrobial agents for local decontamination.

Indexed as

DecontaminationAgedAnastomotic LeakAnti-Bacterial AgentsFemaleHumansMaleRectal NeoplasmsRectumTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeAnti-Bacterial AgentsAnastomotic leakageLocal decontaminationOral antibioticsRectal surgerySDD

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.