Trial reportThe international journal of cardiovascular imaging2018
Comparison of effects of losartan and metoprolol on left ventricular and aortic function at rest and during exercise in chronic aortic regurgitation.
Trial report in The international journal of cardiovascular imaging, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- l -Arginine Can Enhance the Beneficial Effect of Losartan in Patients with Chronic Aortic Regurgitation and Isolated Systolic Hypertension.The International journal of angiology : official publication of the International College of Angiology, Inc · 2021Article
- Exercise cardiovascular magnetic resonance: feasibility and development of biventricular function and great vessel flow assessment, during continuous exercise accelerated by Compressed SENSE: preliminary results in healthy volunteers.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2021Article
- Exercise cardiovascular magnetic resonance: development, current utility and future applications.Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance · 2020Review
- Cardiovascular imaging 2018 in the International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Aortic regurgitation (AR) increases the hemodynamic load on both the left ventricle (LV) and the aorta. Vasodilators and beta-blockers both reduce systemic blood pressure, but their relative effects on the LV and aortic function and aortic regurgitant fraction in chronic AR are uncertain. We aimed to compare short-term effects of losartan and metoprolol on LV and aortic function in asymptomatic patients with chronic moderate to severe AR, both at rest and during exercise, using cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging. 17 chronic AR patients were randomized to 4-6 weeks losartan followed by metoprolol, or vice versa, in a cross-over design. Aortic regurgitant fraction, aortic distensibility, pulse wave velocity and LV function were assessed at rest and after moderate exercise stress (29 ± 7 W, heart rate increase 25 ± 6 bpm) using CMR. Chronic AR patients on metoprolol had a significantly lower mean heart rate, cardiac power index and rate-pressure product, than on losartan (all p < 0.01). However, aortic regurgitant fraction was greater on metoprolol compared to losartan (by 7 ± 11%, p = 0.02). Metoprolol was also associated with a greater reduction in aortic distensibility during exercise than losartan (- 2.4 ± 1.5 × 10
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.