Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29119018›Full record

ReviewJournal of thoracic disease2017

Metastasectomy in pediatric patients: indications, technical tips and outcomes.

Paolo Scanagatta, Lara Girelli

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of thoracic disease, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Paolo ScanagattaDivision of Thoracic Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.
Lara GirelliDivision of Thoracic Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pulmonary metastasectomy has become a standard procedure for pediatric patients with certain types of solid tumors. Surgeons, expert pediatric oncologists and radiation oncologists contribute with their different skills to the management of pulmonary metastases. Patients are usually scheduled for surgery in case of primary tumor control, in absence of metastases in other organs and when a complete resection is achievable. Nodules are removed through precision resections using electrocautery or laser methods in order to ensure radical surgery with adequate margins. With these techniques, it is possible to preserve the surrounding parenchyma and cause a limited volumetric distortion as compared with staplers. Anatomical resections (segmentectomy, lobectomy or pneumonectomy) should be reserved for selected cases, since major lung resection can only be justified if it leads to a real oncological advantage. Repeated thoracotomies are possible, since there is no theoretical limit to reinterventions. Surgery of lung metastases has a therapeutic and curative role for some histology with acceptable rate of complications but it finds its role only in an aggressive multimodality approach. Indications can be discussed case by case and exceptions can be evaluated also in presence of different evidences. Children affected by metastatic tumors need to be managed by expert multidisciplinary oncological team in referral center with large experience.

Indexed as

multidisciplinary teampediatric cancerPulmonary metastasectomy

Identifiers

PMID29119018
PMCPMC5653507

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.