ReviewFrontiers in psychology2017
Cognitive and Neural Correlates of Mathematical Giftedness in Adults and Children: A Review.
Review in Frontiers in psychology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.
- Low math anxiety prevents math achievement decline for urban but not rural Chinese schoolchildren.Frontiers in psychology · 2025Article
- Neuromyths and knowledge about intellectual giftedness in a highly educated multilingual country.Frontiers in psychology · 2023Article
- Internal Persistence and External Support-What Makes Chinese Teachers of the Mathematically Gifted Stick to Their Post?Frontiers in psychology · 2022Article
- Word learning dogs (Canis familiaris) provide an animal model for studying exceptional performance.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- The neural differences of arithmetic verification performance depend on math skill: Evidence from event-related potential.Neuropsychopharmacology reports · 2021Article
- EEG source-space synchrostate transitions and Markov modeling in the math-gifted brain during a long-chain reasoning task.Human brain mapping · 2020Article
- Non-symbolic magnitudes are represented spatially: Evidence from a non-symbolic SNARC task.PloS one · 2018Article
- The contributions of executive functions to mathematical learning difficulties and mathematical talent during adolescence.PloS one · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Most mathematical cognition research has focused on understanding normal adult function and child development as well as mildly and moderately impaired mathematical skill, often labeled developmental dyscalculia and/or mathematical learning disability. In contrast, much less research is available on cognitive and neural correlates of gifted/excellent mathematical knowledge in adults and children. In order to facilitate further inquiry into this area, here we review 40 available studies, which examine the cognitive and neural basis of gifted mathematics. Studies associated a large number of cognitive factors with gifted mathematics, with spatial processing and working memory being the most frequently identified contributors. However, the current literature suffers from low statistical power, which most probably contributes to variability across findings. Other major shortcomings include failing to establish domain and stimulus specificity of findings, suggesting causation without sufficient evidence and the frequent use of invalid backward inference in neuro-imaging studies. Future studies must increase statistical power and neuro-imaging studies must rely on supporting behavioral data when interpreting findings. Studies should investigate the factors shown to correlate with math giftedness in a more specific manner and determine exactly how individual factors may contribute to gifted math ability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.