Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29118683›Full record

ArticlePerspectives in health information managemen2017

The E-health Literacy Demands of Australia's My Health Record: A Heuristic Evaluation of Usability.

Louisa Walsh, Bronwyn Hemsley, Meredith Allan, Natalie Adams, Susan Balandin, Andrew Georgiou, Isabel Higgins, Shaun McCarthy, Sophie Hill

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Perspectives in health information managemen, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.9field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. eHealth Literacy of Australian Undergraduate Health Profession Students: A Descriptive Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  11. Patient participation in electronic nursing documentation: An interview study among home-care patients.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Assessing the information quality and usability ofHealth information management : journal of the Health Information Management Association of Australia
    Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Louisa WalshLa Trobe University Centre for Health Communication and Participation in Victoria, Australia.
Bronwyn HemsleyThe University of Newcastle in Australia.
Meredith AllanDeakin University in Australia.
Natalie AdamsUniversity of Newcastle in Australia.
Susan BalandinDeakin University in Australia.
Andrew GeorgiouAustralian Institute of Health Innovation in Australia.
Isabel HigginsUniversity of Newcastle in Australia.
Shaun McCarthyNewcastle Law School in Australia.
Sophie HillLa Trobe University in Australia.
University of Newcastle Australia · AUDeakin University · AULa Trobe University · AUAustralian Institute of Health and Welfare · AUNewcastle College · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: My Health Record is Australia's electronic personal health record system, which was introduced in July 2012. As of August 2017, approximately 21 percent of Australia's total population was registered to use My Health Record. Internationally, usability issues have been shown to negatively influence the uptake and use of electronic health record systems, and this scenario may particularly affect people who have low e-health literacy. It is likely that usability issues are negatively affecting the uptake and use of My Health Record in Australia. Objective: To identify potential e-health literacy-related usability issues within My Health Record through a heuristic evaluation method. Methods: Between September 14 and October 12, 2016, three of the authors conducted a heuristic evaluation of the two consumer-facing components of My Health Record-the information website and the electronic health record itself. These two components were evaluated against two sets of heuristics-the Health Literacy Online checklist and the Monkman Heuristics. The Health Literacy Online checklist and Monkman Heuristics are evidence-based checklists of web design elements with a focus on design for audiences with low health literacy. During this heuristic evaluation, the investigators individually navigated through the consumer-facing components of My Health Record, recording instances where the My Health Record did not conform to the checklist criteria. After the individual evaluations were completed, the investigators conferred and aggregated their results. From this process, a list of usability violations was constructed. Results: When evaluated against the Health Literacy Online Checklist, the information website demonstrated violations in 12 of 35 criteria, and the electronic health record demonstrated violations in 16 of 35 criteria. When evaluated against the Monkman Heuristics, the information website demonstrated violations in 7 of 11 criteria, and the electronic health record demonstrated violations in 9 of 11 criteria. The identified violations included usability issues with the reading levels used within My Health Record, the graphic design elements, the layout of web pages, and a lack of images and audiovisual tools to support learning. Other important usability issues included a lack of translated resources, difficulty using accessibility tools, and complexity of the registration processes. Conclusion: My Health Record is an important piece of technology that has the potential to facilitate better communication between consumers and their health providers. However, this heuristic evaluation demonstrated that many usability-related elements of My Health Record cater poorly to users at risk of having low e-health literacy. Usability issues have been identified as an important barrier to use of personal health records internationally, and the findings of this heuristic evaluation demonstrate that usability issues may be substantial barriers to the uptake and use of My Health Record.

Indexed as

Health LiteracyUser-Computer InterfaceAustraliaElectronic Health RecordsHeuristicsHumansTelemedicineconsumer health informationelectronic health recordshealth communicationhealth literacyhealth records, personalheuristicsmedical informatics

Identifiers

PMID29118683
PMCPMC5653954
OpenAlexW2788058210

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.