ArticlePerspectives in health information managemen2017
The E-health Literacy Demands of Australia's My Health Record: A Heuristic Evaluation of Usability.
Article in Perspectives in health information managemen, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.
- Functionalities and Issues in the Implementation of Personal Health Records: Systematic Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2021Pooled it
- "Managing the Binder": A Systematic Review of the Burdens Experienced by Patients and Carers in Managing Personal Health Information Across Fragmented Healthcare Systems.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Engagement with the national electronic health records by people with Parkinson's disease.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2026Article
- Service Users' Perspectives on an Integrated Electronic Care Record in Mental Health Care: Qualitative Vignette and Interview Study.JMIR medical informatics · 2025Article
- Consumer perspectives on the national electronic health record and barriers to its adoption in Germany: does health policy require a change in communication?BMC health services research · 2025Observational
- Usability Evaluation Methods Used in Electronic Discharge Summaries: Literature Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2024Review
- Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices about Electronic Personal Health Records: A Cross-Sectional Study in a Region of Northern Italy.Journal of medical systems · 2024Article
- The Implementation of Federated Digital Identifiers in Health Care: Rapid Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2024Review
- Digital Health Literacy as a Predictor of Awareness, Engagement, and Use of a National Web-Based Personal Health Record: Population-Based Survey Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2022Article
- eHealth Literacy of Australian Undergraduate Health Profession Students: A Descriptive Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Patient participation in electronic nursing documentation: An interview study among home-care patients.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2022Article
- Chinese Version of the mHealth App Usability Questionnaire: Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Validation.Frontiers in psychology · 2022Article
- Evaluating the usability of a national health information system with heuristic method.Journal of education and health promotion · 2022Article
- Conceptualizing Usability for the eHealth Context: Content Analysis of Usability Problems of eHealth Applications.JMIR formative research · 2021Article
- Development of "Advancing People of Color in Clinical Trials Now!": Web-Based Randomized Controlled Trial Protocol.JMIR research protocols · 2020Article
- Pregnant women and mobile apps: Unraveling pregnant women's adoption of mobile pregnancy education apps.Digital healthArticle
- Assessing the information quality and usability ofHealth information management : journal of the Health Information Management Association of AustraliaArticle
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: My Health Record is Australia's electronic personal health record system, which was introduced in July 2012. As of August 2017, approximately 21 percent of Australia's total population was registered to use My Health Record. Internationally, usability issues have been shown to negatively influence the uptake and use of electronic health record systems, and this scenario may particularly affect people who have low e-health literacy. It is likely that usability issues are negatively affecting the uptake and use of My Health Record in Australia. Objective: To identify potential e-health literacy-related usability issues within My Health Record through a heuristic evaluation method. Methods: Between September 14 and October 12, 2016, three of the authors conducted a heuristic evaluation of the two consumer-facing components of My Health Record-the information website and the electronic health record itself. These two components were evaluated against two sets of heuristics-the Health Literacy Online checklist and the Monkman Heuristics. The Health Literacy Online checklist and Monkman Heuristics are evidence-based checklists of web design elements with a focus on design for audiences with low health literacy. During this heuristic evaluation, the investigators individually navigated through the consumer-facing components of My Health Record, recording instances where the My Health Record did not conform to the checklist criteria. After the individual evaluations were completed, the investigators conferred and aggregated their results. From this process, a list of usability violations was constructed. Results: When evaluated against the Health Literacy Online Checklist, the information website demonstrated violations in 12 of 35 criteria, and the electronic health record demonstrated violations in 16 of 35 criteria. When evaluated against the Monkman Heuristics, the information website demonstrated violations in 7 of 11 criteria, and the electronic health record demonstrated violations in 9 of 11 criteria. The identified violations included usability issues with the reading levels used within My Health Record, the graphic design elements, the layout of web pages, and a lack of images and audiovisual tools to support learning. Other important usability issues included a lack of translated resources, difficulty using accessibility tools, and complexity of the registration processes. Conclusion: My Health Record is an important piece of technology that has the potential to facilitate better communication between consumers and their health providers. However, this heuristic evaluation demonstrated that many usability-related elements of My Health Record cater poorly to users at risk of having low e-health literacy. Usability issues have been identified as an important barrier to use of personal health records internationally, and the findings of this heuristic evaluation demonstrate that usability issues may be substantial barriers to the uptake and use of My Health Record.
Indexed as
Identifiers
29118683PMC5653954W2788058210What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.