Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29118459›Full record

ArticleJournal of mathematical psychology2017

Model-based functional neuroimaging using dynamic neural fields: An integrative cognitive neuroscience approach.

Sobanawartiny Wijeakumar, Joseph P Ambrose, John P Spencer, Rodica Curtu

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of mathematical psychology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Discrete Dynamics of Dynamic Neural Fields.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2021
    Article
  4. The development of working memory.Current directions in psychological science · 2020
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Model-based cognitive neuroscience.Journal of mathematical psychology · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Sobanawartiny WijeakumarUniversity of East Anglia, School of Psychology, Norwich NR4 7TJ.
Joseph P AmbroseUniversity of Iowa, Department of Psychology and Delta Center, Iowa City 52242, Iowa, U.S.A.
John P SpencerUniversity of East Anglia, School of Psychology, Norwich NR4 7TJ.
Rodica CurtuUniversity of Iowa, Department of Mathematics and Delta Center, Iowa City 52242, Iowa, U.S.A.
University of East Anglia · GBUniversity of Iowa · US

Funding

Probing the Neural Basis of Visual Working Memory in Early DevelopmentR01HD083287 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF EAST ANGLIA · PI SPENCER, JOHN P · 2016 to 2020
$1.9M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD083287
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A fundamental challenge in cognitive neuroscience is to develop theoretical frameworks that effectively span the gap between brain and behavior, between neuroscience and psychology. Here, we attempt to bridge this divide by formalizing an integrative cognitive neuroscience approach using dynamic field theory (DFT). We begin by providing an overview of how DFT seeks to understand the neural population dynamics that underlie cognitive processes through previous applications and comparisons to other modeling approaches. We then use previously published behavioral and neural data from a response selection Go/Nogo task as a case study for model simulations. Results from this study served as the 'standard' for comparisons with a model-based fMRI approach using dynamic neural fields (DNF). The tutorial explains the rationale and hypotheses involved in the process of creating the DNF architecture and fitting model parameters. Two DNF models, with similar structure and parameter sets, are then compared. Both models effectively simulated reaction times from the task as we varied the number of stimulus-response mappings and the proportion of Go trials. Next, we directly simulated hemodynamic predictions from the neural activation patterns from each model. These predictions were tested using general linear models (GLMs). Results showed that the DNF model that was created by tuning parameters to capture simultaneously trends in neural activation and behavioral data quantitatively outperformed a Standard GLM analysis of the same dataset. Further, by using the GLM results to assign functional roles to particular clusters in the brain, we illustrate how DNF models shed new light on the neural populations' dynamics within particular brain regions. Thus, the present study illustrates how an interactive cognitive neuroscience model can be used in practice to bridge the gap between brain and behavior.

Identifiers

PMID29118459
PMCPMC5673285
OpenAlexW2564015730

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.