Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29118439›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Rheumatology2018

Preventing progression from arthralgia to arthritis: targeting the right patients.

Hanna W van Steenbergen, José A Pereira da Silva, Tom W J Huizinga, Annette H M van der Helm-van Mil

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Rheumatology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 60 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
60citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
9.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

60 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 125 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Can the General Public Be a Proxy for an "At-Risk" Group in a Patient Preference Study? A Disease Prevention Example in Rheumatoid Arthritis.Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Hanna W van SteenbergenDepartment of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Centre, C4-R, PO Box 9600, Leiden, RC 2300, The Netherlands.
José A Pereira da SilvaFaculty of Medicine and Centro Hospitalar Unioversitário, Universidade de Coimbra, Rua do Colégio Novo, Apartado 6153, 3001-802 Coimbra, Portugal.
Tom W J HuizingaDepartment of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Centre, C4-R, PO Box 9600, Leiden, RC 2300, The Netherlands.
Annette H M van der Helm-van MilDepartment of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Centre, C4-R, PO Box 9600, Leiden, RC 2300, The Netherlands.
Leiden University · NLHospitais da Universidade de Coimbra · PT

Funding

European Research Council 714312
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Early treatment is associated with improved outcomes in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), suggesting that a 'window of opportunity', in which the disease is most susceptible to disease-modifying treatment, exists. Autoantibodies and markers of systemic inflammation can be present long before clinical arthritis, and maturation of the immune response seems to coincide with the development of RA. The pre-arthritis phase associated with symptoms such as as joint pain without clinical arthritis (athralgia) is now hypothesized to fall within the aforementioned window of opportunity. Consequently, disease modulation in this phase might prevent the occurrence of clinically apparent arthritis, which would result in a persistent disease course if untreated. Several ongoing proof-of-concept trials are now testing this hypothesis. This Review highlights the importance of adequate risk prediction for the correct design, execution and interpretation of results of these prevention trials, as well as considerations when translating these findings into clinical practice. The patients' perspectives are discussed, and the accuracy with which RA development can be predicted in patients presenting with arthralgia is evaluated. Currently, the best starting position for preventive studies is proposed to be the inclusion of patients with an increased risk of RA, such as those identified as fulfilling the EULAR definition of 'arthralgia suspicious for progression to RA'.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnti-Citrullinated Protein AntibodiesArthralgiaArthritisArthritis, RheumatoidAutoantibodiesAutoimmunityBiomarkersDisease ProgressionHumansImmunosuppressive AgentsInflammationMicePredictive Value of TestsRisk FactorsSecondary PreventionAnti-Citrullinated Protein AntibodiesAutoantibodiesBiomarkersImmunosuppressive Agents

Identifiers

PMID29118439
PMCPMC6298577
OpenAlexW2767253742

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.