Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29118406›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2017

Single-cell Co-expression Subnetwork Analysis.

Thomas E Bartlett, Sören Müller, Aaron Diaz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Thomas E BartlettDepartment of Statistical Science, University College, London, UK. thomas.bartlett.10@ucl.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0003-0831-9713
Sören MüllerDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, USA.
Aaron DiazDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9059-9501

Funding

Translational InformaticsP30CA082103 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI Jennifer Leigh Clarke · 1999 to 2026
$209.7M
Tissue CoreP50CA097257 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI Joseph F Costello · 2002 to 2026
$57.4M
Medical Research Council MR/P014070/1NCI NIH HHS P30 CA082103NCI NIH HHS P50 CA097257
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Single-cell transcriptomic data have rapidly become very popular in genomic science. Genomic science also has a long history of using network models to understand the way in which genes work together to carry out specific biological functions. However, working with single-cell data presents major challenges, such as zero inflation and technical noise. These challenges require methods to be specifically adapted to the context of single-cell data. Recently, much effort has been made to develop the theory behind statistical network models. This has lead to many new models being proposed, and has provided a thorough understanding of the properties of existing models. However, a large amount of this work assumes binary-valued relationships between network nodes, whereas genomic network analysis is traditionally based on continuous-valued correlations between genes. In this paper, we assess several established methods for genomic network analysis, we compare ways that these methods can be adapted to the single-cell context, and we use mixture-models to infer binary-valued relationships based on gene-gene correlations. Based on these binary relationships, we find that excellent results can be achieved by using subnetwork analysis methodology popular amongst network statisticians. This methodology thereby allows detection of functional subnetwork modules within these single-cell genomic networks.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsModels, GeneticAnimalsCluster AnalysisGene Expression ProfilingGene Regulatory NetworksGenomicsHumansNeuronsSingle-Cell Analysis

Identifiers

PMID29118406
PMCPMC5678118

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.