ArticleScientific reports2017
Single-cell Co-expression Subnetwork Analysis.
Article in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Inferring gene-regulatory networks using epigenomic priors.iScience · 2026Article
- Transcriptional and functional consequences of alterations to MEF2C and its topological organization in neuronal models.American journal of human genetics · 2022Article
- A mathematical model for cell cycle control: graded response or quantized response.Cell cycle (Georgetown, Tex.) · 2022Article
- Reference Module-Based Analysis of Ovarian Cancer Transcriptome Identifies Important Modules and Potential Drugs.Biochemical genetics · 2022Article
- Fusion of single-cell transcriptome and DNA-binding data, for genomic network inference in cortical development.BMC bioinformatics · 2021Article
- Correlation AnalyzeR: functional predictions from gene co-expression correlations.BMC bioinformatics · 2021Article
- Transcriptomic Changes of Murine Visceral Fat Exposed to Intermittent Hypoxia at Single Cell Resolution.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020Article
- The Phenotypes of Proliferating Glioblastoma Cells Reside on a Single Axis of Variation.Cancer discovery · 2019Article
- SCMarker: Ab initio marker selection for single cell transcriptome profiling.PLoS computational biology · 2019Article
- Single-cell transcriptomics unveils gene regulatory network plasticity.Genome biology · 2019Article
- An integrative approach for building personalized gene regulatory networks for precision medicine.Genome medicine · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Single-cell transcriptomic data have rapidly become very popular in genomic science. Genomic science also has a long history of using network models to understand the way in which genes work together to carry out specific biological functions. However, working with single-cell data presents major challenges, such as zero inflation and technical noise. These challenges require methods to be specifically adapted to the context of single-cell data. Recently, much effort has been made to develop the theory behind statistical network models. This has lead to many new models being proposed, and has provided a thorough understanding of the properties of existing models. However, a large amount of this work assumes binary-valued relationships between network nodes, whereas genomic network analysis is traditionally based on continuous-valued correlations between genes. In this paper, we assess several established methods for genomic network analysis, we compare ways that these methods can be adapted to the single-cell context, and we use mixture-models to infer binary-valued relationships based on gene-gene correlations. Based on these binary relationships, we find that excellent results can be achieved by using subnetwork analysis methodology popular amongst network statisticians. This methodology thereby allows detection of functional subnetwork modules within these single-cell genomic networks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.