ArticleHypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension2018
Aortic stiffness improves the prediction of both diagnosis and severity of coronary artery disease.
Article in Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Noninvasive Assessment of Arterial Wall and Soluble ST2 in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes and Coronary Artery Disease.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Usefulness of Arterial Stiffness as an Integrated Marker of Cardiovascular Risk.Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2025Article
- Assessment of aortic stiffness in computed tomography - methodology of radiological examination from 2000 to 2020.Polish journal of radiology · 2022Review
- Pulsatile Hemodynamics and Coronary Artery Disease.Korean circulation journal · 2021Review
- Usefulness of the SAGE score to predict elevated values of brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity in Japanese subjects with hypertension.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2020Article
- Prevalence of office and ambulatory hypotension in treated hypertensive patients with coronary disease.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2020Article
- Arterial Stiffness and Coronary Ischemia: New Aspects and Paradigms.Current hypertension reports · 2020Review
- Stressful life events and augmentation index: results from the Cardiovascular and Metabolic Diseases Etiology Research Center.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2020Article
- Brachial-Ankle Pulse Wave Velocity Versus Its Stiffness Index β-Transformed Value as Risk Marker for Cardiovascular Disease.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2019Observational
- Determinants of pulse wave velocity index and potential implementations.Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2019Article
- Application of a decision tree to establish factors associated with a nomogram of aortic stiffness.Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2019Article
- Impact of aortic stiffness on myocardial ischaemia in non-obstructive coronary artery disease.Open heartArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Elective coronography has low diagnostic yield for obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD). We aim to determine whether non-invasive aortic stiffness assessment improves diagnostic accuracy of CAD screening by reducing the number of false-positive results from the cardiac stress test. A cross-sectional study was conducted from January 2013 to September 2014 in our medical center. Electrocardiogram (ECG) stress test coupled with nuclear imaging was performed in 367 consecutive patients routinely followed for myocardial ischemia screening. Aortic pulse wave velocity (PWV) was assessed by applanation tonometry in the overall population. Forty-two patients underwent elective coronography because of ischemia. Theoretical PWV was calculated according to age, blood pressure and gender. The results were expressed as an index ((measured PWV-theoretical PWV)/theoretical PWV) for each patient. Ten patients presented with obstructive CAD, 16 patients had non-obstructive CAD and 16 patients had normal coronary angiography. PWV index and severity of CAD were positively correlated (P=0.001). All patients with obstructive CAD had a positive PWV index. When considering the PWV index retrospectively, the false positive results of cardiac stress test were significantly reduced (P<0.001). Twenty-three procedures may have been avoided in the present study cohort. The salient finding of this study was that in patients with known or suspected CAD, routinely followed aortic PWV index may be considered clinically useful for reducing the rate of unnecessary invasive angiographies. The clinical relevance of this individualized decision approach should be confirmed in a large-scale study. Prospective studies have the potential to evaluate the PWV index as a marker of CAD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
29118329What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.