ReviewThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2017
Review in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.
- Evaluation of a nanosecond dissipative soliton resonance fiber laser for multiphoton microscopy.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Impaired axon regeneration and heightened synaptic dynamics in the injured aged mammalian cortex.iScience · 2025Article
- Article
- Neuronal Redevelopment and the Regeneration of Neuromodulatory Axons in the Adult Mammalian Central Nervous System.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2022Review
- In vivo imaging of injured cortical axons reveals a rapid onset form of Wallerian degeneration.BMC biology · 2020Article
- Expanding the Genetic Code for Neuronal Studies.Chembiochem : a European journal of chemical biology · 2020Review
- Repeat intravital imaging of the murine spinal cord reveals degenerative and reparative responses of spinal axons in real-time following a contusive SCI.Experimental neurology · 2020Article
- Investigating learning-related neural circuitry with chronic in vivo optical imaging.Brain structure & function · 2020Review
- Catecholaminergic axons in the neocortex of adult mice regrow following brain injury.Experimental neurology · 2020Article
- A novel kit for early diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease using a fluorescent nanoparticle imaging.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- Neuroimmunology - the past, present and future.Clinical and experimental immunology · 2019Review
- Review
- Understanding the axonal response to injury by in vivo imaging in the mouse spinal cord: A tale of two branches.Experimental neurology · 2019Review
- Progress in brain barriers and brain fluid research in 2017.Fluids and barriers of the CNS · 2018Article
- Bidirectional Microglia-Neuron Communication in Health and Disease.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2018Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.