Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29118136›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2017

Variably hungry caterpillars: predictive models and foliar chemistry suggest how to eat a rainforest.

Simon T Segar, Martin Volf, Brus Isua, Mentap Sisol, Conor M Redmond, Margaret E Rosati, Bradley Gewa, Kenneth Molem, Chris Dahl, Jeremy D Holloway and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Simon T SegarFaculty of Science, University of South Bohemia in Ceske Budejovice, Branisovska 1760, 37005 Ceske Budejovice, Czech Republic simon.t.segar@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6621-9409
Martin VolfFaculty of Science, University of South Bohemia in Ceske Budejovice, Branisovska 1760, 37005 Ceske Budejovice, Czech Republic.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4126-3897
Brus IsuaNew Guinea Binatang Research Center, PO Box 604 Madang, Madang, Papua New Guinea.
Mentap SisolNew Guinea Binatang Research Center, PO Box 604 Madang, Madang, Papua New Guinea.
Conor M RedmondFaculty of Science, University of South Bohemia in Ceske Budejovice, Branisovska 1760, 37005 Ceske Budejovice, Czech Republic.
Margaret E RosatiNational Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Box 37012, Washington, DC 20013-7012, USA.
Bradley GewaNew Guinea Binatang Research Center, PO Box 604 Madang, Madang, Papua New Guinea.
Kenneth MolemNew Guinea Binatang Research Center, PO Box 604 Madang, Madang, Papua New Guinea.
Chris DahlFaculty of Science, University of South Bohemia in Ceske Budejovice, Branisovska 1760, 37005 Ceske Budejovice, Czech Republic.
Jeremy D HollowayDepartment of Life Sciences, The Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD, UK.
Yves BassetFaculty of Science, University of South Bohemia in Ceske Budejovice, Branisovska 1760, 37005 Ceske Budejovice, Czech Republic.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1942-5717
Scott E MillerNational Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Box 37012, Washington, DC 20013-7012, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4138-1378
George D WeiblenBell Museum of Natural History and Department of Plant and Microbial Biology, University of Minnesota, 1479 Gortner Avenue, Saint Paul, MN 55108-1095, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8720-4887
Juha-Pekka SalminenDepartment of Chemistry, University of Turku, Vatselankatu 2, FI-20500 Turku, Finland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2912-7094
Vojtech NovotnyFaculty of Science, University of South Bohemia in Ceske Budejovice, Branisovska 1760, 37005 Ceske Budejovice, Czech Republic.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7918-8023

Funding

Conservation and Sustainable Use of Biodiversity in PNGU01TW006671 · FIC · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI BARROWS, LOUIS R · 2003 to 2014
$8.8M
FIC NIH HHS U01 TW006671
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A long-term goal in evolutionary ecology is to explain the incredible diversity of insect herbivores and patterns of host plant use in speciose groups like tropical Lepidoptera. Here, we used standardized food-web data, multigene phylogenies of both trophic levels and plant chemistry data to model interactions between Lepidoptera larvae (caterpillars) from two lineages (Geometridae and Pyraloidea) and plants in a species-rich lowland rainforest in New Guinea. Model parameters were used to make and test blind predictions for two hectares of an exhaustively sampled forest. For pyraloids, we relied on phylogeny alone and predicted 54% of species-level interactions, translating to 79% of all trophic links for individual insects, by sampling insects from only 15% of local woody plant diversity. The phylogenetic distribution of host-plant associations in polyphagous geometrids was less conserved, reducing accuracy. In a truly quantitative food web, only 40% of pair-wise interactions were described correctly in geometrids. Polyphenol oxidative activity (but not protein precipitation capacity) was important for understanding the occurrence of geometrids (but not pyraloids) across their hosts. When both foliar chemistry and plant phylogeny were included, we predicted geometrid-plant occurrence with 89% concordance. Such models help to test macroevolutionary hypotheses at the community level.

Indexed as

Food ChainHerbivoryAnimalsLarvaModels, BiologicalMothsNew GuineaPhylogenyPlant LeavesPlantsRainforestbiodiversityfood websGeometridaeoxidative activityPapua New GuineaPyraloidea

Identifiers

PMID29118136
PMCPMC5698651

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.