Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29118091›Full record

ReviewEssays in biochemistry2017

Structure-based drug design: aiming for a perfect fit.

Rob L M van Montfort, Paul Workman

Open access · hybridAbstract readReviewEditorial
In one paragraph

Review in Essays in biochemistry, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed, 114 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Special Issue "Structural Dynamics of Macromolecules".International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Ensemble Docking for Intrinsically Disordered Proteins.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2025
    Article
  12. The Need for Continuing Blinded Pose- and Activity Prediction Benchmarks.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2025
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Ensemble docking for intrinsically disordered proteins.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. The molecular determinants of calcium ATPase inhibition by curcuminoids.Biochimica et biophysica acta. Biomembranes · 2024
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Rob L M van MontfortCancer Research UK Cancer Therapeutics Unit, Division of Cancer Therapeutics, The Institute of Cancer Research, London SM2 5NG, U.K. rob.vanmontfort@icr.ac.uk paul.workman@icr.ac.uk.
Paul WorkmanCancer Research UK Cancer Therapeutics Unit, Division of Cancer Therapeutics, The Institute of Cancer Research, London SM2 5NG, U.K. rob.vanmontfort@icr.ac.uk paul.workman@icr.ac.uk.
Institute of Cancer Research · GB

Funding

Cancer Research UK 11566Cancer Research UK 22897Cancer Research UK C2739/A22897
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Knowledge of the three-dimensional structure of therapeutically relevant targets has informed drug discovery since the first protein structures were determined using X-ray crystallography in the 1950s and 1960s. In this editorial we provide a brief overview of the powerful impact of structure-based drug design (SBDD), which has its roots in computational and structural biology, with major contributions from both academia and industry. We describe advances in the application of SBDD for integral membrane protein targets that have traditionally proved very challenging. We emphasize the major progress made in fragment-based approaches for which success has been exemplified by over 30 clinical drug candidates and importantly three FDA-approved drugs in oncology. We summarize the articles in this issue that provide an excellent snapshot of the current state of the field of SBDD and fragment-based drug design and which offer key insights into exciting new developments, such as the X-ray free-electron laser technology, cryo-electron microscopy, open science approaches and targeted protein degradation. We stress the value of SBDD in the design of high-quality chemical tools that are used to interrogate biology and disease pathology, and to inform target validation. We emphasize the need to maintain the scientific rigour that has been traditionally associated with structural biology and extend this to other methods used in drug discovery. This is particularly important because the quality and robustness of any form of contributory data determines its usefulness in accelerating drug design, and therefore ultimately in providing patient benefit.

Indexed as

Drug DesignMolecular Docking SimulationCryoelectron MicroscopyCrystallography, X-RayDatabases, ProteinDrug DiscoveryDrugs, InvestigationalHumansMolecular Targeted TherapyProteinsStructure-Activity RelationshipDrugs, InvestigationalProteinsdrug discovery and designpharmacologystructure

Identifiers

PMID29118091
PMCPMC5869280
OpenAlexW2767812299

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.