Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29117521›Full record

ArticleBiophysical journal2017

Sparse Labeling PELDOR Spectroscopy on Multimeric Mechanosensitive Membrane Channels.

Katrin Ackermann, Christos Pliotas, Silvia Valera, James H Naismith, Bela E Bode

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysical journal, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Nanomolar Pulse Dipolar EPR Spectroscopy in Proteins: CuThe journal of physical chemistry. B · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Sub-Micromolar Pulse Dipolar EPR Spectroscopy Reveals Increasing CuAngewandte Chemie (International ed. in English) · 2019
    Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Katrin AckermannCentre of Magnetic Resonance, University of St Andrews, North Haugh, St Andrews, Fife, United Kingdom; Biomedical Sciences Research Complex and EaStCHEM School of Chemistry, University of St Andrews, North Haugh, St Andrews, Fife, United Kingdom.
Christos PliotasCentre of Magnetic Resonance, University of St Andrews, North Haugh, St Andrews, Fife, United Kingdom; Biomedical Sciences Research Complex and EaStCHEM School of Chemistry, University of St Andrews, North Haugh, St Andrews, Fife, United Kingdom.
Silvia ValeraCentre of Magnetic Resonance, University of St Andrews, North Haugh, St Andrews, Fife, United Kingdom; Biomedical Sciences Research Complex and EaStCHEM School of Chemistry, University of St Andrews, North Haugh, St Andrews, Fife, United Kingdom.
James H NaismithBiomedical Sciences Research Complex and EaStCHEM School of Chemistry, University of St Andrews, North Haugh, St Andrews, Fife, United Kingdom.
Bela E BodeCentre of Magnetic Resonance, University of St Andrews, North Haugh, St Andrews, Fife, United Kingdom; Biomedical Sciences Research Complex and EaStCHEM School of Chemistry, University of St Andrews, North Haugh, St Andrews, Fife, United Kingdom. Electronic address: beb2@st-andrews.ac.uk.
University of St Andrews · GB

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pulse electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) is being applied to ever more complex biological systems comprising multiple subunits. Membrane channel proteins are of great interest as pulse EPR reports on functionally significant but distinct conformational states in a native environment without the need for crystallization. Pulse EPR, in the form of pulsed electron-electron double resonance (PELDOR), using site-directed spin labeling, is most commonly employed to accurately determine distances (in the nanometer range) between different regions of the structure. However, PELDOR data analysis is more challenging in systems containing more than two spins (e.g., homomultimers) due to distorting multispin effects. Without suppression of these effects, much of the information contained in PELDOR data cannot be reliably retrieved. Thus, it is of utmost importance for future PELDOR applications in structural biology to develop suitable approaches that can overcome the multispin problem. Here, two different approaches for suppressing multispin effects in PELDOR, sparse labeling of the protein (reducing the labeling efficiency f) and reducing the excitation probability of spins (λ), are compared on two distinct bacterial mechanosensitive channels. For both the pentameric channel of large conductance (MscL) and the heptameric channel of small conductance (MscS) of Escherichia coli, mutants containing a spin label in the cytosolic or the transmembrane region were tested. Data demonstrate that distance distributions can be significantly improved with either approach compared to the standard PELDOR measurement, and confirm that λ < 1/(n-1) is needed to sufficiently suppress multispin effects (with n being the number of spins in the system). A clear advantage of the sparse labeling approach is demonstrated for the cytosolic mutants due to a significantly smaller loss in sensitivity. For the transmembrane mutants, this advantage is less pronounced but still useful for MscS, but performance is inferior for MscL possibly due to structural perturbations by the bulkier diamagnetic spin label analog.

Indexed as

Electron Spin Resonance SpectroscopyMechanical PhenomenaSpin LabelsBiomechanical PhenomenaCell MembraneCytosolEscherichia coli ProteinsIon ChannelsModels, MolecularMutationProtein MultimerizationProtein Structure, QuaternaryEscherichia coli ProteinsIon ChannelsMscL protein, E coliMscS protein, E coliSpin Labels

Identifiers

PMID29117521
PMCPMC5685675
OpenAlexW2767242926

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.