Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29117327›Full record

SynthesisClinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America2017

Maternal Colonization With Group B Streptococcus and Serotype Distribution Worldwide: Systematic Review and Meta-analyses.

Neal J Russell, Anna C Seale, Megan O'Driscoll, Catherine O'Sullivan, Fiorella Bianchi-Jassir, Juan Gonzalez-Guarin, Joy E Lawn, Carol J Baker, Linda Bartlett, Clare Cutland and 11 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04059510 (opTImisation of Methods for a Human INfection Model for Group B Streptococcus), which is not on this map. Cited by 298 papers, 12 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
298citing papers in PubMed, 12 pooled it
37.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04059510 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

opTImisation of Methods for a Human INfection Model for Group B Streptococcus

TypeobservationalSponsorSt George's, University of LondonRan2019 to 2020Enrolled500ConditionsGroup B StreptococcusArmsrectovaginal swab, pregnancy test, Menstrual cup, Blood test, Focus group
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

298 citing papers in PubMed, 12 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 534 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Rapid tests for detecting group B streptococcus colonization in pregnant women: A systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2026
    Pooled it
  3. Prevalence of Group BMedical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Molecular epidemiology ofMicrobial genomics · 2023
    Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Clinical Risk Factors Associated With Late-Onset Invasive Group B Streptococcal Disease: Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2022
    Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Pooled it
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Microbiology (Reading, England) · 2026
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

238 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 15 institutions in 7 countries.

Neal J RussellMaternal, Adolescent, Reproductive and Child Health Centre, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, United Kingdom.
Anna C SealeMaternal, Adolescent, Reproductive and Child Health Centre, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, United Kingdom.
Megan O'DriscollCentre for International Child Health, Imperial College London, United Kingdom.
Catherine O'SullivanPaediatric Infectious Diseases Research Group, St George's, University of London, United Kingdom.
Fiorella Bianchi-JassirMaternal, Adolescent, Reproductive and Child Health Centre, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, United Kingdom.
Juan Gonzalez-GuarinHospital Clínica Corpas, Bogotá, Colombia.
Joy E LawnMaternal, Adolescent, Reproductive and Child Health Centre, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, United Kingdom.
Carol J BakerDepartments of Pediatrics and Molecular Virology and Microbiology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas.
Linda BartlettDepartment of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland.
Clare CutlandMedical Research Council: Respiratory and Meningeal Pathogens Research Unit, and Department of Science and Technology/National Research Foundation: Vaccine Preventable Diseases, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand,Johannesburg, South Africa.
Michael G GravettGlobal Alliance to Prevent Prematurity and Stillbirth.
Paul T HeathPaediatric Infectious Diseases Research Group, St George's, University of London, United Kingdom.
Kirsty Le DoareCentre for International Child Health, Imperial College London, United Kingdom.
Shabir A MadhiMedical Research Council: Respiratory and Meningeal Pathogens Research Unit, and Department of Science and Technology/National Research Foundation: Vaccine Preventable Diseases, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Craig E RubensGlobal Alliance to Prevent Prematurity and Stillbirth.
Stephanie SchragNational Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.
Ajoke Sobanjo-Ter MeulenBill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Seattle, Washington.
Johan VekemansWorld Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Samir K SahaBangladesh Institute of Child Health, Dhaka.
Margaret IpDepartment of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Chinese University of Hong Kong.
GBS Maternal Colonization Investigator Group
St George's, University of London · GBLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBUniversity of Washington · USBaylor College of Medicine · USCenters for Disease Control and Prevention · USChild Health Research Foundation · BDChinese University of Hong Kong · HKGates Foundation · USHaramaya University · ETImperial College London · GBJohns Hopkins University · USKing's College London · GBNational Health Laboratory Service · ZAUniversity of the Witwatersrand · ZAWorld Health Organization · CH

Funding

Wellcome Trust 205184/Z/16/ZWorld Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMaternal rectovaginal colonization with group B Streptococcus (GBS) is the most common pathway for GBS disease in mother, fetus, and newborn. This article, the second in a series estimating the burden of GBS, aims to determine the prevalence and serotype distribution of GBS colonizing pregnant women worldwide.

methodsWe conducted systematic literature reviews (PubMed/Medline, Embase, Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences Literature [LILACS], World Health Organization Library Information System [WHOLIS], and Scopus), organized Chinese language searches, and sought unpublished data from investigator groups. We applied broad inclusion criteria to maximize data inputs, particularly from low- and middle-income contexts, and then applied new meta-analyses to adjust for studies with less-sensitive sampling and laboratory techniques. We undertook meta-analyses to derive pooled estimates of maternal GBS colonization prevalence at national and regional levels.

resultsThe dataset regarding colonization included 390 articles, 85 countries, and a total of 299924 pregnant women. Our adjusted estimate for maternal GBS colonization worldwide was 18% (95% confidence interval [CI], 17%-19%), with regional variation (11%-35%), and lower prevalence in Southern Asia (12.5% [95% CI, 10%-15%]) and Eastern Asia (11% [95% CI, 10%-12%]). Bacterial serotypes I-V account for 98% of identified colonizing GBS isolates worldwide. Serotype III, associated with invasive disease, accounts for 25% (95% CI, 23%-28%), but is less frequent in some South American and Asian countries. Serotypes VI-IX are more common in Asia.

conclusionsGBS colonizes pregnant women worldwide, but prevalence and serotype distribution vary, even after adjusting for laboratory methods. Lower GBS maternal colonization prevalence, with less serotype III, may help to explain lower GBS disease incidence in regions such as Asia. High prevalence worldwide, and more serotype data, are relevant to prevention efforts.

Indexed as

Streptococcus agalactiaeCarrier StateFemaleHumansPregnancyPregnancy Complications, InfectiousPrevalenceSerotypingStreptococcal Infectionscolonizationgroup B Streptococcuspregnancyserotypesvaginal

Identifiers

PMID29117327
PMCPMC5848259
OpenAlexW2767698099

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.