Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29117273›Full record

ArticleJAMA cardiology2017

Coronary Artery Calcium Score for Long-term Risk Classification in Individuals With Type 2 Diabetes and Metabolic Syndrome From the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis.

Shaista Malik, Yanglu Zhao, Matthew Budoff, Khurram Nasir, Roger S Blumenthal, Alain G Bertoni, Nathan D Wong

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA cardiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 99 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
99citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
14.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

99 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 202 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Guideline
  5. Guideline
  6. Guideline
  7. Pooled it
  8. The effect of Vitamin-KJournal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2022
    Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Review
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

39 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Shaista MalikDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of California, Irvine.
Yanglu ZhaoDepartment of Epidemiology, UCLA (University of California, Los Angeles), Los Angeles.
Matthew BudoffLos Angeles Biomedical Research Institute, Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Los Angeles, California.
Khurram NasirCenter for Prevention and Wellness Research, Baptist Health Medical Group, Miami Beach, Florida.
Roger S BlumenthalCiccarone Center for the Prevention of Heart Disease, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.
Alain G BertoniDepartment of Epidemiology and Prevention, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina.
Nathan D WongDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of California, Irvine.
University of California, Irvine · USBaptist Hospital of Miami · USJohns Hopkins University · USThe Lundquist Institute · USUniversity of California, Los Angeles · USWake Forest University · US

Funding

SBHW-PREDICT (The role of PRoteomics, gEnetics, and Directed Imaging using CT)R01HL128801 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI MALIK, SHAISTA · 2015 to 2019
$3.1M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL128801
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Although the risk of type 2 diabetes is considered to be equivalent to coronary heart disease (CHD) risk, there is considerable heterogeneity among individuals for CHD and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk. It is not known whether coronary artery calcium (CAC) assessment at baseline in individuals with established metabolic syndrome (MetS) or diabetes identifies CHD and ASCVD prognostic indicators during a long follow-up period. Objective: To compare improvement in long-term prognostication of incident CHD and ASCVD using CAC scores among those with diabetes, MetS, or neither condition. Design, Setting, and Participants: This study included participants from the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA), a prospective cohort study of 6814 males and females aged 45 to 84 years without known CVD from 4 race/ethnicity groups (white [38.5%], African American [27.5%], Hispanic [22.1%], and Chinese [11.9%]) recruited from 6 US communities from July 2000 through August 2002. Follow-up for each participant extended to the first occurrence of an incident event, other death, loss to follow-up, or the last follow-up call through December 31, 2013. Data analysis was performed from June 1, 2016, to September 12, 2017. Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs). Area under the receiver operator characteristic curve and net reclassification improvement were used to compare incremental contributions of CAC score when added to the Framingham risk score, ethnicity/race, and socioeconomic status. Main Outcomes and Measures: CHD events, including myocardial infarction, resuscitated cardiac arrest, or CHD death. Results: Of 6814 MESA participants, 6751 had complete risk factor and follow-up data and were included in this study (mean [SD] age, 62.2 [10.2] years; 3186 [47.2%] male). A total of 881 (13.0%) had diabetes, 1738 (25.7%) had MetS, and 4132 (61.2%) had neither condition. After 11.1 mean years of follow-up, CHD events occurred in 84 participants with diabetes (135 ASCVD events), 115 with MetS (175 ASCVD events), and 157 with neither (250 ASCVD events). The CAC score was independently associated with incident CHD in multivariable analyses in those with diabetes (HR, 1.30; 95% CI, 1.19-1.43), MetS (HR, 1.30; 95% CI, 1.20-1.41), and neither condition (HR, 1.37; 95% CI, 1.27-1.47). For incident CHD, net reclassification improvement with addition of CAC score was 0.23 (95% CI, 0.10-0.37) in those with diabetes, 0.22 (95% CI, 0.09-0.35) in those with MetS, and 0.25 (95% CI, 0.15-0.35) in those with neither condition. The CAC score was also a prognostic indicator of CHD and ASCVD after controlling for diabetes duration of 10 years or longer at baseline, insulin use, and glycemic control. Conclusions and Relevance: In a large multiethnic cohort, the addition of CAC score to global risk assessment was associated with significantly improved risk classification in those with MetS and diabetes, even if diabetes duration was longer than a decade, suggesting a role for the CAC score in risk assessment in such patients.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overArea Under CurveComorbidityCoronary Artery DiseaseCoronary DiseaseDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2EthnicityFemaleHeart ArrestHumansHypoglycemic AgentsInsulinMaleMetabolic SyndromeMiddle AgedHypoglycemic AgentsInsulin

Identifiers

PMID29117273
PMCPMC5814996
OpenAlexW2767743404

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.