Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29117218›Full record

ArticlePloS one2017

Compatible bacterial mixture, tolerant to desiccation, improves maize plant growth.

Dalia Molina-Romero, Antonino Baez, Verónica Quintero-Hernández, Miguel Castañeda-Lucio, Luis Ernesto Fuentes-Ramírez, María Del Rocío Bustillos-Cristales, Osvaldo Rodríguez-Andrade, Yolanda Elizabeth Morales-García, Antonio Munive, Jesús Muñoz-Rojas

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed
20.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed, 172 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Dalia Molina-RomeroLaboratorio de Ecología Molecular Microbiana (LEMM), Centro de Investigaciones en Ciencias Microbiológicas (CICM), Instituto de Ciencias (IC), Benemérita Universidad Autónoma de Puebla (BUAP), Edificio IC11, Ciudad Universitaria, Colonia Jardines de San Manuel, Puebla, Puebla, México.
Antonino BaezLaboratorio de Ecología Molecular Microbiana (LEMM), Centro de Investigaciones en Ciencias Microbiológicas (CICM), Instituto de Ciencias (IC), Benemérita Universidad Autónoma de Puebla (BUAP), Edificio IC11, Ciudad Universitaria, Colonia Jardines de San Manuel, Puebla, Puebla, México.
Verónica Quintero-HernándezCONACYT, LEMM, CICM, IC-BUAP, Edificio IC11, Ciudad Universitaria, Colonia Jardines de San Manuel, Puebla, Puebla, México.
Miguel Castañeda-LucioGenética Molecular Microbiana, CICM, IC-BUAP, Edificio IC11, Ciudad Universitaria, Colonia Jardines de San Manuel, Puebla, Puebla, México.
Luis Ernesto Fuentes-RamírezLaboratorio de Ecología Molecular Microbiana (LEMM), Centro de Investigaciones en Ciencias Microbiológicas (CICM), Instituto de Ciencias (IC), Benemérita Universidad Autónoma de Puebla (BUAP), Edificio IC11, Ciudad Universitaria, Colonia Jardines de San Manuel, Puebla, Puebla, México.
María Del Rocío Bustillos-CristalesLaboratorio de Ecología Molecular Microbiana (LEMM), Centro de Investigaciones en Ciencias Microbiológicas (CICM), Instituto de Ciencias (IC), Benemérita Universidad Autónoma de Puebla (BUAP), Edificio IC11, Ciudad Universitaria, Colonia Jardines de San Manuel, Puebla, Puebla, México.
Osvaldo Rodríguez-AndradeLaboratorio de Ecología Molecular Microbiana (LEMM), Centro de Investigaciones en Ciencias Microbiológicas (CICM), Instituto de Ciencias (IC), Benemérita Universidad Autónoma de Puebla (BUAP), Edificio IC11, Ciudad Universitaria, Colonia Jardines de San Manuel, Puebla, Puebla, México.
Yolanda Elizabeth Morales-GarcíaLaboratorio de Ecología Molecular Microbiana (LEMM), Centro de Investigaciones en Ciencias Microbiológicas (CICM), Instituto de Ciencias (IC), Benemérita Universidad Autónoma de Puebla (BUAP), Edificio IC11, Ciudad Universitaria, Colonia Jardines de San Manuel, Puebla, Puebla, México.
Antonio MuniveLaboratorio de Ecología Molecular Microbiana (LEMM), Centro de Investigaciones en Ciencias Microbiológicas (CICM), Instituto de Ciencias (IC), Benemérita Universidad Autónoma de Puebla (BUAP), Edificio IC11, Ciudad Universitaria, Colonia Jardines de San Manuel, Puebla, Puebla, México.
Jesús Muñoz-RojasLaboratorio de Ecología Molecular Microbiana (LEMM), Centro de Investigaciones en Ciencias Microbiológicas (CICM), Instituto de Ciencias (IC), Benemérita Universidad Autónoma de Puebla (BUAP), Edificio IC11, Ciudad Universitaria, Colonia Jardines de San Manuel, Puebla, Puebla, México.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1151-9778
Benemérita Universidad Autónoma de Puebla · MX

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) increase plant growth and crop productivity. The inoculation of plants with a bacterial mixture (consortium) apparently provides greater benefits to plant growth than inoculation with a single bacterial strain. In the present work, a bacterial consortium was formulated containing four compatible and desiccation-tolerant strains with potential as PGPR. The formulation had one moderately (Pseudomonas putida KT2440) and three highly desiccation-tolerant (Sphingomonas sp. OF178, Azospirillum brasilense Sp7 and Acinetobacter sp. EMM02) strains. The four bacterial strains were able to adhere to seeds and colonize the rhizosphere of plants when applied in both mono-inoculation and multi-inoculation treatments, showing that they can also coexist without antagonistic effects in association with plants. The effects of the bacterial consortium on the growth of blue maize were evaluated. Seeds inoculated with either individual bacterial strains or the bacterial consortium were subjected to two experimental conditions before sowing: normal hydration or desiccation. In general, inoculation with the bacterial consortium increased the shoot and root dry weight, plant height and plant diameter compared to the non-inoculated control or mono-inoculation treatments. The bacterial consortium formulated in this work had greater benefits for blue maize plants even when the inoculated seeds underwent desiccation stress before germination, making this formulation attractive for future field applications.

Indexed as

AcinetobacterAzospirillum brasilenseBiomassCrops, AgriculturalDesiccationMexicoMicrobial ConsortiaPlant DevelopmentPlant RootsPseudomonas putidaRhizosphereSeedsSphingomonasSymbiosisZea mays

Identifiers

PMID29117218
PMCPMC5678714
OpenAlexW2767956798

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.