Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29117202›Full record

ArticlePloS one2017

Oil palm monoculture induces drastic erosion of an Amazonian forest mammal fauna.

Ana Cristina Mendes-Oliveira, Carlos A Peres, Paula Cristina R de A Maués, Geovana Linhares Oliveira, Ivo G B Mineiro, Susanne L Silva de Maria, Renata C S Lima

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Molecular Detection ofTransboundary and emerging diseases · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ana Cristina Mendes-OliveiraLaboratory of Ecology and Zoology of Vertebrate, Institute of Biological Science, Federal University of Pará, Belém, Pará, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7863-9678
Carlos A PeresCentre for Ecology, Evolution and Conservation, School of Environmental Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, Norfolk, United Kingdom.
Paula Cristina R de A MauésLaboratory of Ecology and Zoology of Vertebrate, Institute of Biological Science, Federal University of Pará, Belém, Pará, Brazil.
Geovana Linhares OliveiraLaboratory of Ecology and Zoology of Vertebrate, Institute of Biological Science, Federal University of Pará, Belém, Pará, Brazil.
Ivo G B MineiroLaboratory of Ecology and Zoology of Vertebrate, Institute of Biological Science, Federal University of Pará, Belém, Pará, Brazil.
Susanne L Silva de MariaLaboratory of Ecology and Zoology of Vertebrate, Institute of Biological Science, Federal University of Pará, Belém, Pará, Brazil.
Renata C S LimaLaboratory of Ecology and Zoology of Vertebrate, Institute of Biological Science, Federal University of Pará, Belém, Pará, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Oil palm monoculture comprises one of the most financially attractive land-use options in tropical forests, but cropland suitability overlaps the distribution of many highly threatened vertebrate species. We investigated how forest mammals respond to a landscape mosaic, including mature oil palm plantations and primary forest patches in Eastern Amazonia. Using both line-transect censuses (LTC) and camera-trapping (CT), we quantified the general patterns of mammal community structure and attempted to identify both species life-history traits and the environmental and spatial covariates that govern species intolerance to oil palm monoculture. Considering mammal species richness, abundance, and species composition, oil palm plantations were consistently depauperate compared to the adjacent primary forest, but responses differed between functional groups. The degree of forest habitat dependency was a leading trait, determining compositional dissimilarities across habitats. Considering both the LTC and CT data, distance from the forest-plantation interface had a significant effect on mammal assemblages within each habitat type. Approximately 87% of all species detected within oil palm were never farther than 1300 m from the forest edge. Our study clearly reinforces the notion that conventional oil palm plantations are extremely hostile to native tropical forest biodiversity, which does not bode well given prospects for oil palm expansion in both aging and new Amazonian deforestation frontiers.

Indexed as

AgricultureConservation of Natural ResourcesForestsAnimalsArecaceaeBrazilGeographyMammalsPalm OilPrincipal Component AnalysisSpecies SpecificityPalm Oil

Identifiers

PMID29117202
PMCPMC5695600

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.