ReviewGenes2017
Amphibian and Avian Karyotype Evolution: Insights from Lampbrush Chromosome Studies.
Review in Genes, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Non-Canonical Male Meiosis in a Marine Gastropod,Biology · 2025Article
- Article
- Large tandem repeats of grass frog (Rana temporaria) in silico and in situ.BMC genomics · 2025Article
- Lampbrush chromosomes of Danio rerio.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2025Article
- Remarkable chromosomes and karyotypes: A top 10 list.Molecular biology of the cell · 2024Review
- Karyotypes of water frogs from the Pelophylax esculentus complex: results of cross-species chromosomal painting.Chromosoma · 2023Article
- Assignment of the somatic A/B compartments to chromatin domains in giant transcriptionally active lampbrush chromosomes.Epigenetics & chromatin · 2023Article
- Article
- Characterization of axolotl lampbrush chromosomes by fluorescence in situ hybridization and immunostaining.Experimental cell research · 2021Article
- Comparative cytogenetics of the ground frogsComparative cytogenetics · 2020Article
- Genome-wide RAD sequencing to identify a sex-specific marker in Chinese giant salamander Andrias davidianus.BMC genomics · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Amphibian and bird karyotypes typically have a complex organization, which makes them difficult for standard cytogenetic analysis. That is, amphibian chromosomes are generally large, enriched with repetitive elements, and characterized by the absence of informative banding patterns. The majority of avian karyotypes comprise a small number of relatively large macrochromosomes and numerous tiny morphologically undistinguishable microchromosomes. A good progress in investigation of amphibian and avian chromosome evolution became possible with the usage of giant lampbrush chromosomes typical for growing oocytes. Due to the giant size, peculiarities of organization and enrichment with cytological markers, lampbrush chromosomes can serve as an opportune model for comprehensive high-resolution cytogenetic and cytological investigations. Here, we review the main findings on chromosome evolution in amphibians and birds that were obtained using lampbrush chromosomes. In particular, we discuss the data on evolutionary chromosomal rearrangements, accumulation of polymorphisms, evolution of sex chromosomes as well as chromosomal changes during clonal reproduction of interspecies hybrids.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.