Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29117125›Full record

ReviewGenes2017

The Small and the Dead: A Review of Ancient DNA Studies Analysing Micromammal Species.

Roseina Woods, Melissa M Marr, Selina Brace, Ian Barnes

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Genes, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Roseina WoodsDepartment of Earth Sciences, Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD, UK. Rosie.Woods@nhm.ac.uk.
Melissa M MarrDepartment of Earth Sciences, Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD, UK. Melissa.Marr@nhm.ac.uk.
Selina BraceDepartment of Earth Sciences, Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD, UK. S.Brace@nhm.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0003-2126-6732
Ian BarnesDepartment of Earth Sciences, Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD, UK. I.Barnes@nhm.ac.uk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The field of ancient DNA (aDNA) has recently been in a state of exponential growth, largely driven by the uptake of Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) techniques. Much of this work has focused on the mammalian megafauna and ancient humans, with comparatively less studies looking at micromammal fauna, despite the potential of these species in testing evolutionary, environmental and taxonomic theories. Several factors make micromammal fauna ideally suited for aDNA extraction and sequencing. Micromammal subfossil assemblages often include the large number of individuals appropriate for population level analyses, and, furthermore, the assemblages are frequently found in cave sites where the constant temperature and sheltered environment provide favourable conditions for DNA preservation. This review looks at studies that include the use of aDNA in molecular analysis of micromammal fauna, in order to examine the wide array of questions that can be answered in the study of small mammals using new palaeogenetic techniques. This study highlights the bias in current aDNA studies and assesses the future use of aDNA as a tool for the study of micromammal fauna.

Indexed as

ancient DNAmicromammalspalaeogeneticssmall mammals

Identifiers

PMID29117125
PMCPMC5704225

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.