ArticleJournal of computational biology : a journal of computational molecular cell biology2017
GSMC: Combining Parallel Gibbs Sampling with Maximal Cliques for Hunting DNA Motif.
Article in Journal of computational biology : a journal of computational molecular cell biology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Prediction of pivotal pathways and hub genes associated with osteoporosis by Gibbs sampling.Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Regulatory elements are responsible for regulating gene transcription. Therefore, identification of these elements is a tremendous challenge in the field of gene expression. Transcription factors (TFs) play a key role in gene regulation by binding to target promoter sequences. A set of conserved sequence patterns with a highly similar structure that is bound by a TF is called a motif. Motif discovery has been a difficult problem over the past decades. Meanwhile, it is a foundation stone in meeting this challenge. Recent advances in obtaining genomic sequences and high-throughput gene expression analysis techniques have enabled the rapid development of computational methods for motif discovery. As a result, a large number of motif-finding algorithms aiming at various motif models have sprung up in the past few years. However, most of them are not suitable for analysis of the large data sets generated by next-generation sequencing. To better handle large-scale ChIP-Seq data and achieve better performance in computational time and motif detection accuracy, we propose an excellent motif-finding algorithm known as GSMC (Combining Parallel Gibbs Sampling with Maximal Cliques for hunting DNA Motif). The GSMC algorithm consists of two steps. First, we employ the commonly used Gibbs sampling to generating initial motifs. Second, we utilize maximal cliques to cluster motifs according to Similarity with Position Information Contents (SPIC). Consequently, we raise the detection accuracy in a great degree, in the meantime holding comparative computation efficiency. In addition, we can find much more credible cofactor interacting motifs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.