Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29116684›Full record

ArticleJournal of the International AIDS Society2017

Disparities in direct acting antivirals uptake in HIV-hepatitis C co-infected populations in Canada.

Sahar Saeed, Erin C Strumpf, Erica Em Moodie, Jim Young, Roy Nitulescu, Joseph Cox, Alexander Wong, Sharon Walmsely, Curtis Cooper, Marie-Lousie Vachon and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the International AIDS Society, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 63 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

Sahar SaeedDepartment of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Occupational Health, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Erin C StrumpfDepartment of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Occupational Health, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Erica Em MoodieDepartment of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Occupational Health, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Jim YoungDivision of Infectious Diseases/Chronic Viral Illness Service, Department of Medicine, Glen site, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Roy NitulescuDivision of Infectious Diseases/Chronic Viral Illness Service, Department of Medicine, Glen site, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Joseph CoxDepartment of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Occupational Health, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Alexander WongRegina Qu'Appelle Health Region, Regina, SK, Canada.
Sharon WalmselyUniversity Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Curtis CooperDepartment of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Marie-Lousie VachonCentre Hospitalier de l'Université Laval, Quebec, QC, Canada.
Valerie Martel-LaferriereCentre de Recherche du Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Mark HullCentre for Excellence in HIV/AIDS, St. Paul's Hospital, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Brian ConwayVancouver Infectious Diseases Centre, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Marina B KleinDivision of Infectious Diseases/Chronic Viral Illness Service, Department of Medicine, Glen site, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-3063-8430
Canadian Co-Infection Cohort Study
McGill University Health Centre · CACentre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal · CACentre hospitalier de l'Université Laval · CARegina Qu'Appelle Health Region · CASt. Paul's Hospital · CAUniversity Health Network · CAUniversity of Ottawa · CAVancouver Infectious Diseases Centre · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDirect acting antivirals (DAAs) have revolutionized hepatitis C (HCV) treatment with >90% cure rates even in real-world studies, giving hope that HCV can be eliminated. However, for DAAs to have a population-level impact on the burden of HCV disease, treatment uptake needs to be expanded. We investigated temporal trends in HCV treatment uptake and evaluated factors associated with second-generation DAA initiation and efficacy among key HIV-HCV co-infected populations in Canada.

methodsThe Canadian HIV-HCV Co-Infection Cohort Study prospectively follows 1699 participants from 18 centres. Among HCV RNA+ participants, we determined the incidence of HCV treatment initiation per year overall and by key populations between 2007 and 2015. Key populations were based on World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines including: people who actively inject drugs (PWID) (reporting injection drug use, last 6 months); Indigenous people; women and men who have sex with men (MSM). Multivariate Cox models were used to estimate adjusted hazard ratios (aHR) and 2-year probability of initiating second-generation DAAs for each of the key populations.

resultsOverall, HCV treatment initiation rates increased from 8 (95% CI, 6-11) /100 person-years in 2013 to 28 (95% CI, 23-33) /100 person-years in 2015. Among 911 HCV RNA + participants, there were 202 second-generation DAA initiations (93% with interferon-free regimens). After adjustment (aHR, 95% CI), active PWID (0.60, 0.38-0.94 compared to people not injecting drugs) and more generally, people with lower income (<$18 000 CAD/year) (0.50, 0.35, 0.71) were less likely to initiate treatment. Conversely, MSM were more likely to initiate 1.95 (1.33, 2.86) compared to heterosexual men. In our cohort, the population profile with the lowest 2-year probability of initiating DAAs was Indigenous, women who inject drugs (5%, 95% CI 3-8%). Not having any of these risk factors resulted in a 35% (95% CI 32-38%) probability of initiating DAA treatment. Sustained virologic response (SVR) rates were >82% in all key populations.

conclusionWhile treatment uptake has increased with the availability of second-generation DAAs, marginalized populations, already engaged in care, are still failing to access treatment. Targeted strategies to address barriers are needed to avoid further health inequities and to maximize the public health impact of DAAs.

Indexed as

Early Medical InterventionPatient Acceptance of Health CareAdultAntiviral AgentsCanadaCohort StudiesCoinfectionFemaleHepacivirusHepatitis CHIV InfectionsHumansIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedSubstance Abuse, IntravenousAntiviral AgentsDirect acting antivirals (DAAs)DisparitiesHIV-hepatitis C co-infectionIndigenous peoplesMen who have sex with men (MSM)People who inject drug (PWID)Women

Identifiers

PMID29116684
PMCPMC5810331
OpenAlexW2767575038

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.