Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29116623›Full record

ArticlePathology oncology research : POR2019

KRAS Mutation in Gastric Cancer and Prognostication Associated with Microsatellite Instability Status.

Karol Polom, Kakoli Das, Daniele Marrelli, Giandomenico Roviello, Valeria Pascale, Costantino Voglino, Henry Rho, Patrick Tan, Franco Roviello

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Pathology oncology research : POR, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Potent therapeutic strategy in gastric cancer with microsatellite instability-high and/or deficient mismatch repair.Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2024
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2021
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Karol PolomGeneral Surgery and Surgical Oncology Department, University of Siena, viale Bracci 16, 53-100, Siena, Italy. polom.karol@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2011-4155
Kakoli DasCancer and Stem Cell Biology Programme, Duke-NUS Medical School, 8 College Road, Singapore, 169857, Singapore.
Daniele MarrelliGeneral Surgery and Surgical Oncology Department, University of Siena, viale Bracci 16, 53-100, Siena, Italy.
Giandomenico RovielloMedical Oncology Unit, Department of Oncology, San Donato Hospital, Via Nenni 20, 52100, Arezzo, Italy.
Valeria PascaleGeneral Surgery and Surgical Oncology Department, University of Siena, viale Bracci 16, 53-100, Siena, Italy.
Costantino VoglinoGeneral Surgery and Surgical Oncology Department, University of Siena, viale Bracci 16, 53-100, Siena, Italy.
Henry RhoUniversity of Medical Sciences Poznan, Poznan, Poland.
Patrick TanCancer and Stem Cell Biology Programme, Duke-NUS Medical School, 8 College Road, Singapore, 169857, Singapore.
Franco RovielloGeneral Surgery and Surgical Oncology Department, University of Siena, viale Bracci 16, 53-100, Siena, Italy.
University of Siena · ITDuke-NUS Medical School · SGPoznan University of Medical Sciences · PLSingHealth · SGUniversity of Trieste · IT

Funding

FP7 People: Marie-Curie Actions 316929Instituto Toscano Tumori ITT-2007
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microsatellite instability (MSI) is one of the subgroups based on the new molecular classification of gastric cancer (GC). In this study, we analyzed the role of KRAS status in MSI GC and the impact of MSI status on KRAS mutation. We performed analysis on 595 GC patients. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was used for the screening of KRAS mutation (exon 2) and 5 quasi-monomorphic mononucleotide repeats, namely, BAT-26, BAT-25, NR -24, NR-21, and NR-27 were used to determine the MSI status. The KRAS and MSI status were then compared with clinicopathologic data of the GC patients. MSI GC was found in 20.3% of all cases. KRAS mutation was seen in 24 patients; 18 were MSI (75%) and 6 were microsatellite stable (MSS) (25%). MSI GC patients with KRAS mutation were older and mostly female, but MSS presented more advanced T and N stage of the disease, more cardia tumors, and adjuvant treatment. Five-year survival was 72.2% for KRAS mutation patients with MSI and 0% for MSS (p < 0.001). Although KRAS mutations in GC are linked with MSI in the majority of cases, KRAS mutations with MSS status presented with a poor prognosis and a worse outcome. In multivariate analysis, MSI was associated with better survival (p < 0.001) but KRAS was with worse survival (p = 0.304). Our study suggests that KRAS mutations are based on MSI status rather than different codon subtypes of mutation, and such a division could be used to determine the GC patient outcome.

Indexed as

Microsatellite InstabilityMutationAdenocarcinomaAdenocarcinoma, MucinousAgedAged, 80 and overBiomarkers, TumorCarcinoma, Signet Ring CellFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMalePrognosisProto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)Stomach NeoplasmsSurvival RateBiomarkers, TumorKRAS protein, humanProto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)KRAS mutationMismatch repair deficiencyMolecularPrognosisStomach cancer

Identifiers

PMID29116623
OpenAlexW2767691948

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.