Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29116557›Full record

ArticleJournal of biomolecular NMR2017

Bidirectional band-selective magnetization transfer along the protein backbone doubles the information content of solid-state NMR correlation experiments.

M M Jolly, J A Jarvis, M Carravetta, M H Levitt, P T F Williamson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomolecular NMR, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

M M JollyCentre for Biological Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, SO17 1BJ, UK.
J A JarvisCentre for Biological Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, SO17 1BJ, UK.
M CarravettaSchool of Chemistry, University of Southampton, Southampton, SO17 1BJ, UK.
M H LevittSchool of Chemistry, University of Southampton, Southampton, SO17 1BJ, UK.
P T F WilliamsonCentre for Biological Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, SO17 1BJ, UK. P.T.Williamson@soton.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0231-8640

Funding

Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council EP/J00121X/1Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (GB) EP/M023664/1Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (GB) PR140003European Research Council 291044European Research Council 291044 - HYPERSINGLET
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Resonance assignment is the first stage towards solving the structure of a protein. This is normally achieved by the employment of separate inter and intra residue experiments. By utilising the mixed rotation and rotary recoupling (MIRROR) condition it is possible to double the information content through the efficient bidirectional transfer of magnetization from the CO to its adjacent Cα and the Cα of the subsequent amino acid. We have incorporated this into a 3D experiment, a 3D-MIRROR-NCOCA, where correlations present in the 3D spectrum permit the sequential assignment of the protein backbone from a single experiment as we have demonstrated on a microcrystalline preparation of GB3. Furthermore, the low-power requirements of the MIRROR recoupling sequence facilitate the development of a low-power 3D-NCOCA experiment. This has enabled us to realise significant reductions in acquisition times, allowing the acquisition of a single 3D-NCOCA spectrum suitable for a full backbone resonance assignment of GB3 in less than 24 h.

Indexed as

Nuclear Magnetic Resonance, BiomolecularProteinsProteinsDARRGB3MIRRORProtein NMRSequential assignmentSolid-state

Identifiers

PMID29116557
PMCPMC5736786

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.