Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29116552›Full record

ArticlePrevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research2018

Using Facebook to Recruit Parents to Participate in a Family Program to Prevent Teen Drug Use.

Sabrina Oesterle, Marina Epstein, Kevin P Haggerty, Megan A Moreno

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Facebook Recruitment and the Protection of Human Subjects.Western journal of nursing research · 2019
    Article
  16. Effectiveness of Facebook Groups to Boost Participation in a Parenting Intervention.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2019
    Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sabrina OesterleSocial Development Research Group, School of Social Work, University of Washington, 9725 3rd Ave NE, Seattle, WA, 98115, USA. soe@uw.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-2898-6145
Marina EpsteinSocial Development Research Group, School of Social Work, University of Washington, 9725 3rd Ave NE, Seattle, WA, 98115, USA.
Kevin P HaggertySocial Development Research Group, School of Social Work, University of Washington, 9725 3rd Ave NE, Seattle, WA, 98115, USA.
Megan A MorenoSeattle Children's Research Institute, Center for Child Health Behavior and Development, Seattle, WA, USA.
University of Washington · USSeattle Children's Hospital · US

Funding

Using Facebook to recruit parents to a parenting program to prevent teen drug useR21DA039466 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI OESTERLE, SABRINA · 2014 to 2015
$319k
NIDA NIH HHS R21 DA039466
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite strong evidence that family programs are effective in preventing adolescent substance use, recruiting parents to participate in such programs remains a persistent challenge. This study explored the feasibility of using Facebook to recruit parents of middle school students to a self-directed family program to prevent adolescent drug use. The study used paid Facebook ads aiming to recruit 100 parents in Washington and Colorado using marijuana- or parenting-focused messages. All ad-recruited parents were also invited to refer others in order to compare Facebook recruitment to web-based respondent-driven sampling. Despite offering a $15 incentive for each successfully referred participant, the majority of the screened (70.4%) and eligible (65.1%) parents were recruited through Facebook ads. Yet, eligibility and consent rates were significantly higher among referred (76.6 and 57.3%, respectively) than Facebook-recruited parents (60.0 and 36.6%, respectively). Click-through rates on Facebook were higher for marijuana-focused than parenting-focused ads (0.72 and 0.65%, respectively). The final sample (54% Facebook-recruited) consisted of 103 demographically homogeneous parents (female, educated, non-Hispanic White, and mostly from Washington). Although Facebook was an effective and efficient method to recruit parents to a study with equal to better cost-effectiveness than traditional recruitment strategies, the promise of social media to reach a diverse population was not realized. Additional approaches to Facebook recruitment are needed to reach diverse samples in real-world settings and increase public health impact of family programs.

Indexed as

Adolescent BehaviorFamily TherapyPatient SelectionSocial MediaAdolescentAdultChildColoradoCommunicationFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedParentingSubstance-Related DisordersSurveys and Questionnaires(3–5): Social mediaDrug use preventionParenting interventionRecruitmentTeens

Identifiers

PMID29116552
PMCPMC5899621
OpenAlexW2767371219

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.