Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29116550›Full record

ReviewCurrent HIV/AIDS reports2017

Resistance to DAAs: When to Look and When It Matters.

David L Wyles

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current HIV/AIDS reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2018
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

David L WylesDivision of Infectious Diseases, Denver Health Medical Center, 660 Bannock St, MC 4000, Denver, CO, 80204, USA. David.Wyles@dhha.org.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewThis review provides an overview of HCV resistance-associated substitutions (RASs) with a focus on NS3 protease and NS5A inhibitor resistance. Treatment approaches for managing resistance are also covered including the use of newly approved therapies with improved resistance profiles. RECENT

findingsHCV RASs are frequently selected if the patient is not cured during treatment; NS5A RASs persist for prolonged periods of time (years) after treatment failure and may adversely impact retreatment responses. Newly approved regimens with improved potency and resistance profiles are less impacted by resistance and provide the best retreatment options for patients who previously failed DAA therapy. The clinical impact of HCV RASs has been lessened significantly with the introduction of new DAA treatment regimens. Routine testing for resistance is unlikely to impact retreatment approaches if newer regimens are accessible. Knowledge of factors, such as the presence of cirrhosis and prior treatment regimens, remain as the key to optimizing retreatment approaches.

Indexed as

Drug Resistance, ViralAmino Acid SubstitutionAntiviral AgentsDEAD-box RNA HelicasesHepacivirusHepatitis C, ChronicHumansNucleoside-TriphosphataseRNA-Dependent RNA PolymeraseSerine EndopeptidasesViral Nonstructural ProteinsViral ProteasesAntiviral AgentsDEAD-box RNA HelicasesNS3 protein, hepatitis C virusNS-5 protein, hepatitis C virusNucleoside-TriphosphataseRNA-Dependent RNA PolymeraseSerine EndopeptidasesViral Nonstructural ProteinsViral ProteasesDirect acting antiviralsHCVResistance-associated substitutions

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.