Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29116494›Full record

Trial reportClinical oral investigations2018

Clinical and microbiological effectiveness of photodynamic therapy on primary endodontic infections: a 6-month randomized clinical trial.

Rachel Garcia de Miranda, Ana Paula Vieira Colombo

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical oral investigations, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Rachel Garcia de MirandaDepartment of Medical Microbiology, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Institute of Microbiology Paulo de Góes, R. Soares Cabral, 63/702, Laranjeiras, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, CEP 22240070, Brazil. miranda.rachel@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9479-1741
Ana Paula Vieira ColomboDepartment of Medical Microbiology, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Institute of Microbiology Paulo de Góes, R. Soares Cabral, 63/702, Laranjeiras, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, CEP 22240070, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThis short-term randomized controlled trial evaluated the effectiveness of photodynamic therapy (PDT) on clinical success (periapical healing) and on the microbiota of primary endodontic infections.

methodsThirty-two patients presenting mandibular molars with apical periodontitis (one tooth/patient) were selected and randomly allocated into two therapeutic groups: control (chemo-mechanical debridement [CMD]; n = 16) and PDT (CMD + PDT; n = 16). All teeth in both groups had intracanal medication with calcium hydroxide for 7 days before final obturation. Follow-up radiographs were made at 3 and 6 months. Periapical healing was evaluated by the periapical index (PAI). Samples were obtained at baseline, after CMD with or without PDT, and just before root filling to determine the frequency and levels of 37 taxa by checkerboard.

resultsSignificant decreases in PAI scores were observed in both groups over time, although at 6 months, the PDT group presented a significantly better healing score than the control (p < 0.05). At baseline, the most prevalent species in all samples were Candida albicans (46.9%), Dialister pneumosintes (31.2%), Prevotella nigrescens (28.2%), Prevotella tannerae (28.1%), and Peptostreptococcus anaerobius (25%). Most species reduced over time in both groups, and no significant differences in frequency and levels of the tested species were observed between groups in any time point evaluated. C. albicans and D. pneumosintes were still detected in high frequency in both groups at 3 months post-therapy.

conclusionsConventional endodontic therapy with or without PDT is effective in reducing microbial load, resulting in periapical healing. Nevertheless, adjunctive PDT provides better periapical healing at 6-month follow-up. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Teeth with apical periodontitis treated with PDT adjunct to conventional treatment would demonstrate superior healing and reduction of microorganisms.

Indexed as

AdultDNA ProbesFemaleHumansMaleMicrobiotaPain MeasurementPeriapical PeriodontitisPhotochemotherapyRoot Canal Filling MaterialsRoot Canal TherapyTreatment OutcomeDNA ProbesRoot Canal Filling MaterialsApical periodontitisCheckerboard DNA-DNA hybridizationRandomized clinical trialSuccess and failure rate

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.