Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29116417›Full record

ArticleArchives of osteoporosis2017

Epidemiology of fractures in Armenia: development of a country-specific FRAX model and comparison to its surrogate.

O Lesnyak, S Sahakyan, A Zakroyeva, J P Bilezikian, N Hutchings, V Babalyan, R Galstyan, A Lebedev, H Johansson, N C Harvey and 2 more

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of osteoporosis, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. A surrogate FRAX model for Mongolia.Archives of osteoporosis · 2025
    Article
  4. A surrogate FRAX model for Nepal.Archives of osteoporosis · 2024
    Article
  5. Prevalence of HIV-associated osteoporosis and fracture risk in midlife women: a cross-sectional study in Zimbabwe.Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research · 2024
    Article
  6. A new FRAX model for Brazil.Archives of osteoporosis · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Epidemiology of hip fracture in Botswana.Archives of osteoporosis · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
  14. A surrogate FRAX model for the Kyrgyz Republic.Archives of osteoporosis · 2020
    Article
  15. Secondary prevention of fragility fractures in Asia Pacific: an educational initiative.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2020
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. A brief history of FRAX.Archives of osteoporosis · 2018
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

O LesnyakMechnikov North West State Medical University, 41, Kirochnaya Street, St. Petersburg, 191015, Russia.
S SahakyanArtashat Medical Center, 7, Aram Khachaturyan Street, 0701, Artashat, Armenia.
A ZakroyevaUral State Medical University, 3 Repina Street, Yekaterinburg, 620028, Russia.
J P BilezikianCollege of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, 630 W. 168th Street, New York, NY, 10032, USA.
N HutchingsCollege of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, 630 W. 168th Street, New York, NY, 10032, USA.
V Babalyan"Diavant" LLC, 7 Argishti Street, 0015, Yerevan, Armenia.
R GalstyanScientific Center of Traumatology and Orthopedics of the Ministry of Health of the Republic of Armenia, 9, Nork-Marash Street, 0047, Yerevan, Armenia.
A LebedevMechnikov North West State Medical University, 41, Kirochnaya Street, St. Petersburg, 191015, Russia.
H JohanssonInstitute for Health and Ageing, Catholic University of Australia, Melbourne, Australia.
N C HarveyMRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
E McCloskeyCentre for Metabolic Bone Diseases, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
John A KanisInstitute for Health and Ageing, Catholic University of Australia, Melbourne, Australia. w.j.pontefract@sheffield.ac.uk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fracture probabilities derived from the surrogate FRAX model for Armenia were compared to those from the model based on regional estimates of the incidence of hip fracture. Disparities between the surrogate and authentic FRAX models indicate the importance of developing country-specific FRAX models. Despite large differences between models, differences in the rank order of fracture probabilities were minimal.

objectiveArmenia has relied on a surrogate FRAX model based on the fracture epidemiology of Romania. This paper describes the epidemiology of fragility fractures in Armenia used to create an Armenia-specific FRAX model with an aim of comparing this new model with the surrogate model.

methodsWe carried out a population-based study in two regions of Armenia (Ararat and Vayots Dzor representing approximately 11% of the country's population). We aimed to identify all low-energy fractures: retrospectively from hospital registers in 2011-2012 and prospectively in 2013 with the inclusion of primary care sources.

resultsThe differences in incidence between the surveys with and without data from primary care suggested that 44% of patients sustaining a hip fracture did not receive specialized medical care. A similar proportion of forearm and humeral fractures did not come to hospital attention (48 and 49%, respectively). Only 57.7% of patients sustaining a hip fracture were hospitalized. In 2013, hip fracture incidence at the age of 50 years or more was 201/100,000 for women and 136/100,000 for men, and age- and sex-specific rates were incorporated into the new "authentic" FRAX model for Armenia. Compared to the surrogate model, the authentic model gave lower 10-year fracture probabilities in men and women aged less than 70 years but substantially higher above this age. Notwithstanding, there were very close correlations in fracture probabilities between the surrogate and authentic models (> 0.99) so that the revisions had little impact on the rank order of risk.

conclusionA substantial proportion of major osteoporotic fractures in Armenia do not come to hospital attention. The disparities between surrogate and authentic FRAX models indicate the importance of developing country-specific FRAX models. Despite large differences between models, differences in the rank order of fracture probabilities were minimal.

Indexed as

AgedArmeniaFemaleHip FracturesHospitalizationHospitalsHumansHumeral FracturesIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedOsteoporotic FracturesProspective StudiesRegistriesRetrospective StudiesRomaniaEpidemiologyForearm fractureFractureFracture probabilityFRAXHip fractureHumerus fracture

Identifiers

PMID29116417
PMCPMC5676826

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.