Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29116404›Full record

ReviewCurrent atherosclerosis reports2017

Review of Cardiometabolic Effects of Prescription Omega-3 Fatty Acids.

Megan F Burke, Frances M Burke, Daniel E Soffer

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current atherosclerosis reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. The Relationship Between Nutrition and Atherosclerosis.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2021
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Nutrition and Cardiovascular Health.International journal of molecular sciences · 2018
    Review
  11. Fish, Fish Oils and Cardioprotection: Promise or Fish Tale?International journal of molecular sciences · 2018
    Review
  12. The heparan sulfate proteoglycan grip on hyperlipidemia and atherosclerosis.Matrix biology : journal of the International Society for Matrix Biology · 2018
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. PPAR Agonists and Metabolic Syndrome: An Established Role?International journal of molecular sciences · 2018
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Megan F BurkeDepartment of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania Health System, 3400 Spruce Street, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.
Frances M BurkeDepartment of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, University of Pennsylvania Health System, 3400 Civic Center Blvd, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.
Daniel E SofferDepartment of Medicine, Divisions of Internal Medicine and Cardiology, Perelman Center for Advanced Medicine, University of Pennsylvania Health System, 3400 Civic Center Blvd, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA. sofferd@uphs.upenn.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewPopulations with significant dietary fish intake tend to have lower cardiovascular (CV) risk and demonstrable physiologic differences including lower lipid/lipoprotein levels and other direct and indirect effects on the arterial wall and inhibiting factors that promote atherosclerosis. Treatment with high doses of pharmacologic-grade omega-3 fatty acid (n-3FA) supplements achieves significant reductions in triglycerides (TG), non-high-density lipoprotein- (non-HDL-) and TG-rich lipoprotein- (TRL-) cholesterol levels. n-3FA supplements have significant effects on markers of atherosclerosis risk including endothelial function, low-density lipoprotein (LDL) oxidation, cellular and humoral markers of inflammation, hemodynamic factors, and plaque stabilization. This review summarizes the lipid and cardiometabolic effects of prescription-grade n-3FAs and will discuss clinical trials, national/organizational guidelines, and expert opinion on the impact of supplemental n-3FAs on CV health and disease. RECENT

findingsClinical trial evidence supports use of n-3FAs in individuals with established atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD), but the data either does not support or is lacking for other types of cardiometabolic risk including prevention of stroke, treatment in patients with heart failure, diabetes mellitus and prediabetes, and for primary prevention in the general population. Despite inconsistent findings to support widespread benefit, there is persistent population-wide enthusiasm for n-3FA as a dietary supplement for its cardiometabolic benefits. Fortunately, there are ongoing clinical trials to assess whether the lipid/lipoprotein benefits may be extended to other at-risk populations and whether lower-dose therapy may provide background benefit for primary prevention of ASCVD.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular DiseasesDietary SupplementsFatty Acids, Omega-3HumansMetabolic DiseasesFatty Acids, Omega-3Alpha-linolenic acid (ALA)Dietary supplementDocosahexaenoic acid (DHA)Eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA)Ethyl ester (EE)Fatty acid (FA)Free FA (FFA)Linoleic acid (LA)Omega-3 FA (n-3FA)Triglycerides (TG)

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.