Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29116387›Full record

ReviewZeitschrift fur Rheumatologie2017

[Imaging of the sacroiliac joints].

X Baraliakos, M Fruth, J Braun

Abstract readComparative StudyReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Zeitschrift fur Rheumatologie, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

X BaraliakosRheumazentrum Ruhrgebiet Herne, Claudiusstr. 45, 44649, Herne, Deutschland. xenofon.baraliakos@elisabethgruppe.de.
M FruthRheumazentrum Ruhrgebiet Herne, Claudiusstr. 45, 44649, Herne, Deutschland.
J BraunRheumazentrum Ruhrgebiet Herne, Claudiusstr. 45, 44649, Herne, Deutschland.
Rheumazentrum Ruhrgebiet · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The sacroiliac joints (SIJ) are an important part of the axial skeleton and a main area to consider in the examination of back pain both clinically and on imaging. Patients with inflammatory-rheumatic symptoms as well as those with other diagnoses may present with pathological changes in the SIJ even at young ages. Although imaging of the SIJ is not the only factor in approaching the final diagnosis, it nevertheless provides a lot of important information about differential diagnoses, thereby enabling certain causes of back pain to be excluded. Overall, there are four important imaging methods that are being used to evaluate the SIJ in daily routine: conventional radiographs, computed tomography, scintigraphy and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). In recent years, most of the scientific work on imaging of the SIJs has concentrated on a better understanding of the MRI in this context. This overview article describes the advantages and limitations of the different imaging techniques for the visualization of pathologic changes in the SIJ, also taking into account their value in helping the treating physician to make diagnostic and therapeutic decisions in daily clinical practice.

Indexed as

HumansLow Back PainMagnetic Resonance ImagingRadiographyRadionuclide ImagingSacroiliac JointSensitivity and SpecificitySpondylitis, AnkylosingTomography, X-Ray ComputedComputed tomographyDiagnostic x‑rayLow back painMagnetic resonance imagingScintigraphy

Identifiers

PMID29116387
OpenAlexW2767649784

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.