Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29116242›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2017

Task engagement and mental workload involved in variation and repetition of a motor skill.

Natália Lelis-Torres, Herbert Ugrinowitsch, Tércio Apolinário-Souza, Rodolfo N Benda, Guilherme M Lage

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Natália Lelis-TorresSchool of Physical Education, Physiotherapy and Occupational Therapy, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Av. Presidente Carlos Luz, 6627, Pampulha, 31270-901, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Herbert UgrinowitschSchool of Physical Education, Physiotherapy and Occupational Therapy, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Av. Presidente Carlos Luz, 6627, Pampulha, 31270-901, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Tércio Apolinário-SouzaSchool of Physical Education, Physiotherapy and Occupational Therapy, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Av. Presidente Carlos Luz, 6627, Pampulha, 31270-901, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Rodolfo N BendaSchool of Physical Education, Physiotherapy and Occupational Therapy, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Av. Presidente Carlos Luz, 6627, Pampulha, 31270-901, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Guilherme M LageSchool of Physical Education, Physiotherapy and Occupational Therapy, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Av. Presidente Carlos Luz, 6627, Pampulha, 31270-901, Belo Horizonte, Brazil. menezeslage@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0001-8296-3676

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Explanatory hypotheses proposed in behavioral studies assumed that less repetitive practice schedules, such as random practice, seem to demand greater cognitive effort than more repetitive types of practice organization, such as constant. All of these hypotheses emphasize the enhanced demand to memory processes promoted by less repetitive practice schedules. In the present study, we investigated the cognitive effort involved in random and constant practice schedules with an electrophysiological approach. Twenty-one male participants practiced a sequential key-pressing task with two goals: learning the relative timing dimension and learning the absolute timing dimension. Sixty trials were performed in a constant practice schedule (only one absolute timing goal), and sixty trials were performed in random order (three absolute timing goals). Two electroencephalography based measures of cognitive states were used: (a) task engagement (sensory processing and attention resources) and (b) mental workload (working memory load). The results showed that random practice induced greater cognitive effort than constant practice when task engagement was analyzed. Throughout practice, both task engagement and mental workload decreased more in the constant practice condition than in the random practice condition. The increased demand for sensory processing observed in random practice opens a new exciting field of study in practice organization.

Indexed as

CognitionMotor SkillsTask Performance and AnalysisWorkloadAdolescentAdultElectroencephalographyHumansMaleYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID29116242
PMCPMC5676716

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.