Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29116239›Full record

Observational studyPediatric research2018

Validation of the Feverkidstool and procalcitonin for detecting serious bacterial infections in febrile children.

Ruud G Nijman, Yvonne Vergouwe, Henriëtte A Moll, Frank J Smit, Floor Weerkamp, Ewout W Steyerberg, Johan van der Lei, Yolanda B de Rijke, Rianne Oostenbrink

Open access · bronzeAbstract readObservational StudyValidation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in Pediatric research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Ruud G NijmanDepartment of Pediatrics, Erasmus MC-Sophia Children's Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Yvonne VergouweDepartment of Public Health, Centre of Medical Decision Making, Erasmus MC-University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Henriëtte A MollDepartment of Pediatrics, Erasmus MC-Sophia Children's Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Frank J SmitDepartment of Pediatrics, Maasstad Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Floor WeerkampDepartment of Clinical Chemistry, Maasstad Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Ewout W SteyerbergDepartment of Public Health, Centre of Medical Decision Making, Erasmus MC-University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Johan van der LeiDepartment of Medical Informatics, Erasmus MC-University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Yolanda B de RijkeDepartment of Clinical Chemistry, Erasmus MC-University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Rianne OostenbrinkDepartment of Pediatrics, Erasmus MC-Sophia Children's Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Erasmus MC · NLErasmus MC - Sophia Children’s Hospital · NLMaasstad Ziekenhuis · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BackgroundTo validate the Feverkidstool, a prediction model consisting of clinical signs and symptoms and C-reactive protein (CRP) to identify serious bacterial infections (SBIs) in febrile children, and to determine the incremental diagnostic value of procalcitonin.MethodsThis prospective observational study that was carried out at two Dutch emergency departments included children with fever, aged 1 month to 16 years. The prediction models were developed with polytomous logistic regression differentiating "pneumonia" and "other SBIs" from "non-SBIs" using standardized, routinely collected data on clinical signs and symptoms, CRP, and procalcitonin.ResultsA total of 1,085 children were included with a median age of 1.6 years (interquartile range 0.8-3.4); 73 children (7%) had pneumonia and 98 children (9%) had other SBIs. The Feverkidstool showed good discriminative ability in this new population. After adding procalcitonin to the Feverkidstool, c-statistic for "pneumonia" increased from 0.85 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.76-0.94) to 0.86 (0.77-0.94) and for "other SBI" from 0.81 (0.73-0.90) to 0.83 (0.75- 0.91). A model with clinical features and procalcitonin performed similar to the Feverkidstool.ConclusionThis study confirms the external validity of the Feverkidstool, with CRP and procalcitonin being equally valuable for predicting SBI in our population of febrile children. Our findings do not support routine dual use of CRP and procalcitonin.

Indexed as

AdolescentBacterial InfectionsCalcitoninCalibrationChildChild, PreschoolC-Reactive ProteinDecision Support Systems, ClinicalFemaleFeverHumansInfantMaleNetherlandsProcalcitoninProspective StudiesCalcitoninC-Reactive ProteinProcalcitonin

Identifiers

PMID29116239
OpenAlexW2755690779

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.