Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29116215›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2017

Comparative evaluation of tumor targeting using the anti-HER2 ADAPT scaffold protein labeled at the C-terminus with indium-111 or technetium-99m.

Javad Garousi, Sarah Lindbo, Bogdan Mitran, Jos Buijs, Anzhelika Vorobyeva, Anna Orlova, Vladimir Tolmachev, Sophia Hober

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Javad GarousiInstitute for Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Sarah LindboSchool of Biotechnology, Division of Protein Technology, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden.
Bogdan MitranDivision of Molecular Imaging, Department of Medicinal Chemistry, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Jos BuijsInstitute for Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-3955-1320
Anzhelika VorobyevaInstitute for Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Anna OrlovaDivision of Molecular Imaging, Department of Medicinal Chemistry, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Vladimir TolmachevInstitute for Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden. vladimir.tolmachev@igp.uu.se.
Sophia HoberSchool of Biotechnology, Division of Protein Technology, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

ABD-Derived Affinity Proteins (ADAPTs) is a novel class of engineered scaffold proteins derived from an albumin-binding domain of protein G. The use of ADAPT6 derivatives as targeting moiety have provided excellent preclinical radionuclide imaging of human epidermal growth factor 2 (HER2) tumor xenografts. Previous studies have demonstrated that selection of nuclide and chelator for its conjugation has an appreciable effect on imaging properties of scaffold proteins. In this study we performed a comparative evaluation of the anti-HER2 ADAPT having an aspartate-glutamate-alanine-valine-aspartate-alanine-asparagine-serine (DEAVDANS) N-terminal sequence and labeled at C-terminus with

Indexed as

AnimalsCell Line, TumorErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesHumansIndium RadioisotopesOrganotechnetium CompoundsErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesIndium RadioisotopesOrganotechnetium Compounds

Identifiers

PMID29116215
PMCPMC5676751

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.