ArticlePhysics in medicine and biology2018
A line fiducial method for geometric calibration of cone-beam CT systems with diverse scan trajectories.
Article in Physics in medicine and biology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- A synergistic framework for geometric calibration and reconstruction in dual-arm robotic cone-beam computed tomography.Medical physics · 2026Article
- RoboCT: The State and Current Challenges of Industrial Twin Robotic CT Systems.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Source-detector trajectory optimization for CBCT metal artifact reduction based on PICCS reconstruction.Zeitschrift fur medizinische Physik · 2024Article
- Investigations into the Geometric Calibration and Systematic Effects of a Micro-CT System.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Fully automatic online geometric calibration for non-circular cone-beam CT orbits using fiducials with unknown placement.Medical physics · 2024Article
- Line-based iterative geometric calibration method for a tomosynthesis system.Medical physics · 2024Article
- Online Calibration of a Linear Micro Tomosynthesis Scanner.Journal of imaging · 2022Article
- Online Geometric Calibration of a Hybrid CT System for Ultrahigh-Resolution Imaging.Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.) · 2022Article
- [Free trajectory cone beam computed tomography reconstruction method for synchronous scanning of geometric calibration phantom and imaging object].Sheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Modern cone-beam CT systems, especially C-arms, are capable of diverse source-detector orbits. However, geometric calibration of these systems using conventional configurations of spherical fiducials (BBs) may be challenged for novel source-detector orbits and system geometries. In part, this is because the BB configurations are designed with careful forethought regarding the intended orbit so that BB marker projections do not overlap in projection views. Examples include helical arrangements of BBs (Rougee et al 1993 Proc. SPIE 1897 161-9) such that markers do not overlap in projections acquired from a circular orbit and circular arrangements of BBs (Cho et al 2005 Med. Phys. 32 968-83). As a more general alternative, this work proposes a calibration method based on an array of line-shaped, radio-opaque wire segments. With this method, geometric parameter estimation is accomplished by relating the 3D line equations representing the wires to the 2D line equations of their projections. The use of line fiducials simplifies many challenges with fiducial recognition and extraction in an orbit-independent manner. For example, their projections can overlap only mildly, for any gantry pose, as long as the wires are mutually non-coplanar in 3D. The method was tested in application to circular and non-circular trajectories in simulation and in real orbits executed using a mobile C-arm prototype for cone-beam CT. Results indicated high calibration accuracy, as measured by forward and backprojection/triangulation error metrics. Triangulation errors on the order of microns and backprojected ray deviations uniformly less than 0.2 mm were observed in both real and simulated orbits. Mean forward projection errors less than 0.1 mm were observed in a comprehensive sweep of different C-arm gantry angulations. Finally, successful integration of the method into a CT imaging chain was demonstrated in head phantom scans.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.