Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29116020›Full record

ArticleSystematic reviews2017

Assessment of safety and efficacy of mesenchymal stromal cell therapy in preclinical models of acute myocardial infarction: a systematic review protocol.

Carly C Barron, Manoj M Lalu, Duncan J Stewart, Dean Fergusson, Homer Yang, David Moher, Peter Liu, David Mazer, P J Devereaux, Lauralyn McIntyre and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Systematic reviews, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Carly C BarronDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Canada.
Manoj M LaluDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Canada.
Duncan J StewartDepartment of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.
Dean FergussonBlueprint Translational Research Group, Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada.
Homer YangDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Canada.
David MoherBlueprint Translational Research Group, Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada.
Peter LiuThe Ottawa Heart Institute, Ottawa, Canada.
David MazerDepartment of Anesthesia, St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
P J DevereauxPopulation Health Research Institute, David Braley Cardiac, Vascular, and Stroke Research Institute, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.
Lauralyn McIntyreClinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Department of Medicine (Division of Critical Care), University of Ottawa, 501 Smyth Rd, Box 201, Ottawa, ON, K1H 8L6, Canada. lmcintyre@ottawahospital.on.ca.
Canadian Perioperative Anesthesia Clinical Trials Group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite advances in treatment, acute myocardial infarction (MI) is still associated with significant morbidity and mortality, especially in patients with extensive damage and scar formation. Based on some promising preclinical studies, there is interest in the use of mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) to promote cardiac repair after acute MI. However, there is a need for a systematic review of this evidence to summarize the efficacy and safety of MSCs in preclinical models of MI. This will better inform the translation of MSC therapy for acute MI and guide the design of a future clinical trial. METHODS/

designA systematic literature search of MEDLINE, Embase, and BIOSIS Previews will be conducted. We will identify comparative preclinical studies (randomized and non-randomized) of myocardial infarction that include animals given MSC therapy versus a vehicle/placebo. The primary outcome will be left ventricular ejection fraction. Secondary and tertiary outcomes will include death, infarct size, measures of cardiac function, biochemical outcomes, and MSC retention and differentiation. Risk of bias will be assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool. Subgroup analyses will be performed to measure how various sources of preclinical study heterogeneity affect the direction and magnitude of the primary outcome. We will meta-analyze data using inverse variance random effects modeling. DISCUSSION: This systematic review of preclinical evidence will provide a summary of the efficacy and safety of MSCs in animal models of MI. The results will help determine whether sufficient evidence exists to conduct a clinical trial in humans and inform its design.

Indexed as

Mesenchymal Stem CellsMesenchymal Stem Cell TransplantationAnimalsHumansMyocardial InfarctionResearch DesignSystematic Reviews as TopicVentricular Function, LeftMesenchymal stem cellsMesenchymal stromal cellsMyocardial infarctionPerioperative myocardial infarctionPreclinicalSystematic review protocol

Identifiers

PMID29116020
PMCPMC5688817

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.