ArticleMolecular medicine reports2018
Antiangiogenic effects of recombinant human endostatin in lung cancers.
Article in Molecular medicine reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Synthetic Polymers for Drug, Gene, and Vaccine Delivery.Polymer science & technology (Washington, D.C.) · 2025Review
- The efficacy and safety of continuous intravenous infusion of rh-endostatin combined with platinum-based doublet chemotherapy for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.Investigational new drugs · 2024Article
- Angiogenic signaling pathways and anti-angiogenic therapy for cancer.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2023Review
- Real-world outcomes of various regimens of recombinant human endostatin combined with chemotherapy in non-driver gene mutation advanced non-small cell lung cancer.Cancer medicine · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Antiangiogenic therapy, as a new anticancer method, can improve the anticancer effect of traditional therapies. Different antiangiogenic drugs may have different vascular normalization time windows. Whether the antiangiogenic treatment is within the vascular normalization time window is very important in the treatment of cancers. Previous studies have indicated that recombinant human endostatin (rh‑ES) can transiently normalize tumor microvessels. Yet the molecular mechanism and the time window of rh‑ES remains unclear. The aim of the present study was to explore the optimal time window and molecular mechanism of rh‑ES in inhibiting Lewis lung cancer (LLC). By comparatively accessing the changes in microvascular and hypoxic conditions of tumors in host mice treated with rh‑ES or saline for different days, the authors aimed to investigate the best administration time of rh‑ES treatment on human lung cancers and obtain a better understanding concerning the involved molecular mechanism. A total of 40 C57/BL6 mice with LLC xenografts were randomly divided into normal saline (NS) and rh‑ES groups (20 mice/group). 0.2 ml NS or 5 mg/kg rh‑ES were administrated via intraperitoneal injection (i.p.) into each mouse each day during the 9‑day experiment. A total of 5 mice from each group were sacrificed at day 2, 4, 6 or 9. CA9 and RGS5 expression levels of both groups were compared using immunohistochemistry, reverse transcription‑quantitative polymerase chain reaction and ELISA. Rh‑ES caused vascular normalization and improved hypoxia at days 4 and 6. Compared with the control (NS) group, both CA9 and RGS5 expression in rh‑ES group were significantly decreased at days 4 and 6 (P<0.05), while no significant change between two groups was observed at days 2 and 9. Rh‑ES can induce transient tumor vascular normalization and improves tissue hypoxia in LLC tumors. The vascular normalization window is accompanied by the reduction in RGS5 and CA expression.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.