Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29115578›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of oncology2018

Characterization of prostate cancer cell progression in zebrafish xenograft model.

Wei Xu, Brittany A Foster, Mackenzie Richards, Kenneth R Bondioli, Girish Shah, Christopher C Green

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of oncology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Zebrafish Models of Paediatric Brain Tumours.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  7. METTL1-mClinical and translational medicine · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Zebrafish as a Model for Anticancer Nanomedicine Studies.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Tipping the Scales With Zebrafish to Understand Adaptive Tumor Immunity.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Modeling of Solid-Tumor Microenvironment in Zebrafish (Danio Rerio) Larvae.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2020
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Wei XuLouisiana State University Agricultural Center, Baton Rouge, LA, USA.
Brittany A FosterLouisiana State University Agricultural Center, Baton Rouge, LA, USA.
Mackenzie RichardsLouisiana State University Agricultural Center, Baton Rouge, LA, USA.
Kenneth R BondioliLouisiana State University Agricultural Center, Baton Rouge, LA, USA.
Girish ShahSchool of Pharmacy, University of Louisiana, Monroe, LA 71201, USA.
Christopher C GreenLouisiana State University Agricultural Center, Baton Rouge, LA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Early diagnosis of prostate cancer (PCa) is critical for the application of efficient treatment to PCa patients. However, the majority of PCas remains indolent from several months to several years before malignancy. Current diagnosis methods have limitations in their reliability and are inefficient in time cost. Thus, an efficient in vivo PCa cell xenograft model is highly desired for diagnostic studies in PCas. In the present study we present a standardized procedure to create a PCa cell xenograft model using zebrafish (Danio rerio) as the host. PC3-CTR cells, a cell line from adenocarcinoma with stable expression of calcitonin receptor (CRT), were subcutaneously injected into zebrafish larvae at 48 h post fertilization. The nursing conditions for the larvae were optimized with stable survival rates of post hatch and post PC3-CTR cell injection. In this system, the progression of PC3-CTR cells in vivo was evaluated by migration and proliferation of the cells. Massive migrations of PC3 cells in vivo were observed at post injection day (PID)3. The injected PC3-CTR cells eventually invaded the whole larval zebrafish at PID5. Quantification of PC3-CTR cell proliferation was done using quantitative PCR (qPCR) analysis targeting the expression profiles of two PCa housekeeping genes, TATA-binding protein (TBP) and hypoxanthine phosphoribosyltransferase 1 (HPRT1) encoding genes. The excessive proliferation of PC3 cells in vivo was detected with both qPCR assays. Expression levels of one non‑coding gene, prostate cancer associated 3 gene (pca3), and two other genes encoding transient receptor potential ion channel Melastatin 8 (trpm8) and prostate-specific membrane antigen (psma), showed a significantly enhanced aggressiveness of PC3-CTR cells in vivo. The model established in the present study provides an improved in vivo model for the diagnosis of PCas efficiently. This PCa cell xenograft model can also serve as a tool for high throughput anti-PCa drug screening in therapeutic treatments.

Indexed as

Disease Models, AnimalAnimalsCell Line, TumorCell ProliferationDisease ProgressionHeterograftsHumansMaleProstatic NeoplasmsZebrafish

Identifiers

PMID29115578
PMCPMC5743385

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.