Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29115301›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Molecular cell biology2017

Mechanical forces direct stem cell behaviour in development and regeneration.

Kyle H Vining, David J Mooney

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Molecular cell biology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 763 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
763citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

763 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Prepatterned Tissue Stiffness Gradient Controls Organ shape and size.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. FASEB bioAdvances · 2026
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

703 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Kyle H ViningWyss Institute for Biologically Inspired Engineering and John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138, USA.
David J MooneyWyss Institute for Biologically Inspired Engineering and John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138, USA.

Funding

POLYMERIC MATRICES WITH DEFINED CELL ADHESION AND MECHANR01DE013033 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI MOONEY, DAVID J · 1998 to 2018
$3.0M
Anti-Inflammatory Mesenchymal Stem Cell Therapy for Dental ApplicationsK08DE025292 · NIDCR · HARVARD UNIVERSITY · PI VINING, KYLE HOLMBERG · 2016 to 2020
$635k
NIDCR NIH HHS K08 DE025292NIDCR NIH HHS R01 DE013033
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Stem cells and their local microenvironment, or niche, communicate through mechanical cues to regulate cell fate and cell behaviour and to guide developmental processes. During embryonic development, mechanical forces are involved in patterning and organogenesis. The physical environment of pluripotent stem cells regulates their self-renewal and differentiation. Mechanical and physical cues are also important in adult tissues, where adult stem cells require physical interactions with the extracellular matrix to maintain their potency. In vitro, synthetic models of the stem cell niche can be used to precisely control and manipulate the biophysical and biochemical properties of the stem cell microenvironment and to examine how the mode and magnitude of mechanical cues, such as matrix stiffness or applied forces, direct stem cell differentiation and function. Fundamental insights into the mechanobiology of stem cells also inform the design of artificial niches to support stem cells for regenerative therapies.

Indexed as

Adult Stem CellsAnimalsBiomechanical PhenomenaExtracellular MatrixHumansOrganogenesisRegenerationStem Cell Niche

Identifiers

PMID29115301
PMCPMC5803560

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.