Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29115291›Full record

ArticleNature materials2017

Maintenance of neural progenitor cell stemness in 3D hydrogels requires matrix remodelling.

Christopher M Madl, Bauer L LeSavage, Ruby E Dewi, Cong B Dinh, Ryan S Stowers, Margarita Khariton, Kyle J Lampe, Duong Nguyen, Ovijit Chaudhuri, Annika Enejder and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature materials, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 183 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
183citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

183 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Engineered 3D immuno-glial-neurovascular human miBrain model.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Dynamic Flow-Assisted Nanoarchitectonics.ACS applied materials & interfaces · 2025
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

123 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Christopher M MadlDepartment of Bioengineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3221-5041
Bauer L LeSavageDepartment of Bioengineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305, USA.
Ruby E DewiDepartment of Materials Science & Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305, USA.
Cong B DinhDepartment of Materials Science & Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305, USA.
Ryan S StowersDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305, USA.
Margarita KharitonDepartment of Bioengineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305, USA.
Kyle J LampeDepartment of Materials Science & Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305, USA.
Duong NguyenDepartment of Biology and Biological Engineering, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg SE-412 96, Sweden.
Ovijit ChaudhuriDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9287-3401
Annika EnejderDepartment of Materials Science & Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305, USA.
Sarah C HeilshornDepartment of Materials Science & Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9801-6304

Funding

MEDICAL SCIENTIST TRAINING PROGRAMT32GM007198 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI CHI, NEIL C, INSEL, PAUL A · 1985 to 2024
$29.3M
Stanford/UNC Biomimetic U19 Research CenterU19AI116484 · NIAID · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI AMIEVA, MANUEL R, KUO, CALVIN J · 2015 to 2025
$13.5M
Four Laser, 18 Color Cell Sorter in the SSFFS10RR025518 · NCRR · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI HERZENBERG, LEONARD A · 2009 to 2009
$500k
Engineered Intestinal Microenvironments as Preclinical Drug Screening PlatformsR21EB018407 · NIBIB · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI HEILSHORN, SARAH C · 2014 to 2015
$427k
Cell Responsive Hydrogels to Improve Functional Recovery after Spinal Cord InjuryF31EB020502 · NIBIB · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI MADL, CHRISTOPHER MATTHEW · 2015 to 2016
$69k
NCRR NIH HHS S10 RR025518NIAID NIH HHS U19 AI116484NIBIB NIH HHS F31 EB020502NIBIB NIH HHS R21 EB018407NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007198
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neural progenitor cell (NPC) culture within three-dimensional (3D) hydrogels is an attractive strategy for expanding a therapeutically relevant number of stem cells. However, relatively little is known about how 3D material properties such as stiffness and degradability affect the maintenance of NPC stemness in the absence of differentiation factors. Over a physiologically relevant range of stiffness from ∼0.5 to 50 kPa, stemness maintenance did not correlate with initial hydrogel stiffness. In contrast, hydrogel degradation was both correlated with, and necessary for, maintenance of NPC stemness. This requirement for degradation was independent of cytoskeletal tension generation and presentation of engineered adhesive ligands, instead relying on matrix remodelling to facilitate cadherin-mediated cell-cell contact and promote β-catenin signalling. In two additional hydrogel systems, permitting NPC-mediated matrix remodelling proved to be a generalizable strategy for stemness maintenance in 3D. Our findings have identified matrix remodelling, in the absence of cytoskeletal tension generation, as a previously unknown strategy to maintain stemness in 3D.

Indexed as

Materials TestingAnimalsbeta CateninCell CommunicationExtracellular MatrixHydrogelsMiceNeural Stem CellsSignal Transductionbeta CateninHydrogels

Identifiers

PMID29115291
PMCPMC5708569

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.