ArticleAnalytical chemistry2017
Time Gated Luminescence Imaging of Immunolabeled Human Tissues.
Article in Analytical chemistry, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Predicting immune checkpoint inhibitors response via fluorescence lifetime imaging microscopy: a systematic review.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Pooled it
- Development of Time-Resolved Luminescence Measurement Instruments for Biosensing and Bioimaging - An Overview.Measurement : journal of the International Measurement Confederation · 2025Article
- Auto-Phase-Locked Time-Resolved Luminescence Detection: Principles, Applications, and Prospects.Frontiers in chemistry · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Multiplexed immunofluorescence imaging of formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissues is a powerful tool for investigating proteomic profiles and diagnosing disease. However, conventional immunofluorescence with organic dyes is limited in the number of colors that can be simultaneously visualized, is made less sensitive by tissue autofluorescence background, and is usually incompatible with commonly used hematoxylin and eosin staining. Herein, we demonstrate the comparative advantages of using time-gated luminescence microscopy in combination with an emissive Tb(III) complex, Lumi4-Tb, for tissue imaging in terms of sensitivity, multiplexing potential, and compatibility with common immunohistochemistry protocols. We show that time-gated detection of millisecond-scale Tb(III) emission increases signal-to-noise ratio relative to conventional steady-state detection of organic dye fluorescence and permits visualization of low-abundance tissue markers such as Bcl-6 or MSH-6. In addition, temporal separation of long- and short-lifetime (∼nanosecond) signals adds a second dimension for multiplexing and also permits detection of intermolecular Tb(III)-to-dye Förster resonance energy transfer. Furthermore, we demonstrate that the Lumi4-Tb complex is compatible with tyramide signal amplification and, unlike conventional organic dyes, can be reliably used on tissue stained with hematoxylin and eosin. Our results indicate that time-gated luminescence microscopy using Tb(III) labels can provide a sensitive and robust method to perform multiplexed immunofluorescence on archived or clinical tissue specimens.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.