Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29114926›Full record

ArticleStatistics in medicine2018

Measures of clustering and heterogeneity in multilevel Poisson regression analyses of rates/count data.

Peter C Austin, Henrik Stryhn, George Leckie, Juan Merlo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Statistics in medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 110 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
110citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

110 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Contribution of donor hospital characteristics to deceased donor organ recovery rates.American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons · 2026
    Article
  5. Public Dental Expenditure and Dental Visits in Europe and Japan.Community dentistry and oral epidemiology · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

50 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Peter C AustinInstitute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-3337-233X
Henrik StryhnAtlantic Veterinary College, University of Prince Edward Island, Charlottetown, Prince Edward Island, Canada.
George LeckieCentre for Multilevel Modelling, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Juan MerloUnit for Social Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden.

Funding

CIHR CRT43823CIHR CTP 79847CIHR MOP 86508
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multilevel data occur frequently in many research areas like health services research and epidemiology. A suitable way to analyze such data is through the use of multilevel regression models. These models incorporate cluster-specific random effects that allow one to partition the total variation in the outcome into between-cluster variation and between-individual variation. The magnitude of the effect of clustering provides a measure of the general contextual effect. When outcomes are binary or time-to-event in nature, the general contextual effect can be quantified by measures of heterogeneity like the median odds ratio or the median hazard ratio, respectively, which can be calculated from a multilevel regression model. Outcomes that are integer counts denoting the number of times that an event occurred are common in epidemiological and medical research. The median (incidence) rate ratio in multilevel Poisson regression for counts that corresponds to the median odds ratio or median hazard ratio for binary or time-to-event outcomes respectively is relatively unknown and is rarely used. The median rate ratio is the median relative change in the rate of the occurrence of the event when comparing identical subjects from 2 randomly selected different clusters that are ordered by rate. We also describe how the variance partition coefficient, which denotes the proportion of the variation in the outcome that is attributable to between-cluster differences, can be computed with count outcomes. We illustrate the application and interpretation of these measures in a case study analyzing the rate of hospital readmission in patients discharged from hospital with a diagnosis of heart failure.

Indexed as

Regression AnalysisAnalysis of VarianceBiostatisticsCluster AnalysisComputer SimulationHeart FailureHumansMultilevel AnalysisOdds RatioOutcome Assessment, Health CarePatient DischargePatient ReadmissionPoisson DistributionProportional Hazards Modelsmedian incidence rate ratiomedian rate ratiomultilevel analysisPoisson regressionvariance partition coefficient

Identifiers

PMID29114926
PMCPMC5813204

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.