Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29114920›Full record

ArticleGenetic epidemiology2017

Integrative sparse principal component analysis of gene expression data.

Mengque Liu, Xinyan Fan, Kuangnan Fang, Qingzhao Zhang, Shuangge Ma

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetic epidemiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mengque LiuDepartment of Statistics, School of Economics, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China.
Xinyan FanDepartment of Statistics, School of Economics, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China.
Kuangnan FangDepartment of Statistics, School of Economics, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China.
Qingzhao ZhangDepartment of Statistics, School of Economics, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China.
Shuangge MaDepartment of Statistics, School of Economics, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China.ORCID 0000-0001-9001-4999

Funding

Novel methods for identifying genetic interactions in cancer prognosisR01CA204120 · NCI · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI Shuangge Ma · 2016 to 2026
$3.5M
Penalization methods for identifying gene envrionment interactions and applications to melanoma and other cancer typesR21CA191383 · NCI · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI MA, SHUANGGE · 2015 to 2017
$435k
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA204120NCI NIH HHS R21 CA191383
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the analysis of gene expression data, dimension reduction techniques have been extensively adopted. The most popular one is perhaps the PCA (principal component analysis). To generate more reliable and more interpretable results, the SPCA (sparse PCA) technique has been developed. With the "small sample size, high dimensionality" characteristic of gene expression data, the analysis results generated from a single dataset are often unsatisfactory. Under contexts other than dimension reduction, integrative analysis techniques, which jointly analyze the raw data of multiple independent datasets, have been developed and shown to outperform "classic" meta-analysis and other multidatasets techniques and single-dataset analysis. In this study, we conduct integrative analysis by developing the iSPCA (integrative SPCA) method. iSPCA achieves the selection and estimation of sparse loadings using a group penalty. To take advantage of the similarity across datasets and generate more accurate results, we further impose contrasted penalties. Different penalties are proposed to accommodate different data conditions. Extensive simulations show that iSPCA outperforms the alternatives under a wide spectrum of settings. The analysis of breast cancer and pancreatic cancer data further shows iSPCA's satisfactory performance.

Indexed as

Models, GeneticAlgorithmsBreast NeoplasmsFemaleGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansPancreatic NeoplasmsPrincipal Component Analysiscontrasted penalizationgene expression dataintegrative analysissparse PCA

Identifiers

PMID29114920
PMCPMC5912177

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.