Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29114774›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of speech-language pathology2017

Intensive Treatment for Persisting Rhotic Distortions: A Case Series.

Jonathan L Preston, Megan C Leece

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of speech-language pathology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Reproducible Speech Research With the Artificial Intelligence-Ready PERCEPT Corpora.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Tutorial: Motor-Based Treatment Strategies for /r/ Distortions.Language, speech, and hearing services in schools · 2020
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jonathan L PrestonDepartment of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Syracuse University, NY.
Megan C LeeceDepartment of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Syracuse University, NY.

Funding

Ultrasound Biofeedback for Therapy-Resistant Speech Sound Disorders in ChildrenR03DC013152 · NIDCD · SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY · PI PRESTON, JONATHAN · 2013 to 2015
$497k
NIDCD NIH HHS R03 DC013152
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe study explored changes in accuracy of American English rhotics as a result of an intensive 1-week therapy program for adolescents and young adults with residual speech sound errors that had not resolved with previous therapy.

methodFour case reports are presented of individuals aged 13, 17, 21, and 22 years with residual /ɹ/ distortions. Each participant attended a 1-week intensive program consisting of pretreatment assessments, 14 hr of therapy, and posttreatment assessment. Treatment sessions included structured motor-based practice, ultrasound visual feedback of the tongue, and auditory speech perception training. To assess generalization, untreated words and sentences with rhotics were recorded before and after therapy; these were rated by listeners who were blind to when the recordings were taken.

resultsAll participants showed measurable and statistically significant improvement in speech sound accuracy. Averaged across the 4 participants, rhotic accuracy at the word level improved from 35% to 83%. At the sentence level, rhotic accuracy increased from 11% pretreatment to 66% posttreatment in 1 week.

conclusionThe promise of an intensive treatment program that includes motor-based practice, biofeedback, and auditory perception training is illustrated by the case presentations in which substantial improvements in speech sound accuracy were observed. SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIALS: https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.5561254.

Indexed as

PhoneticsSpeechSpeech PerceptionAdolescentBiofeedback, PsychologyFemaleHumansJudgmentLanguage TestsMaleMotor ActivityMotor SkillsNeuropsychological TestsRecovery of FunctionSpeech AcousticsSpeech Intelligibility

Identifiers

PMID29114774
PMCPMC5945059

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.