ArticleSaudi medical journal2017
Efficacy of emergency laparoscopic appendectomy in treating complicated appendicitis for elderly patients.
Article in Saudi medical journal, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- EAES/SAGES evidence-based recommendations and expert consensus on optimization of perioperative care in older adults.Surgical endoscopy · 2024Guideline
- EAES rapid guideline: appendicitis in the elderly.Surgical endoscopy · 2021Guideline
- Laparoscopic appendicectomy is superior to open surgery for complicated appendicitis.Surgical endoscopy · 2019Pooled it
- Laparoscopy versus open appendectomy for elderly patients, a meta-analysis and systematic review.BMC surgery · 2019Pooled it
- Development and Validation of a Clinical Prediction Model for Complicated Appendicitis in the Elderly.Frontiers in surgery · 2022Article
- Preoperative assessment of complicated appendicitis through stress reaction and clinical manifestations.Medicine · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To assess the therapeutic effects of emergency laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) in treating complicated appendicitis (CA) for elderly patients (defined as age 65 years and above). Methods: We conducted a retrospective study of 115 elderly patients with CA who underwent surgical therapy in the Affiliated Huizhou Hospital of Sun Yat-Sun University, Huizhou, Guangdong Province, China between September 2014 and August 2016. Of these, 59 patients consented to open appendectomy (OA), and LA was performed in the other 56 patients. The perioperative and follow-up variables of the 2 groups were analyzed. Results: The operative time in the LA group was longer than the OA group (LA: 70.5±16.0 min versus [vs.] OA: 59.3±12.0 min, p greater than 0.001). The LA group had lower chances of incision infections (LA: 8.9% vs OA: 28.8 %, p=0.007) and shorter hospital stay (LA: 6.1± 2.5 days vs. OA: 9.6±3.5 days, p greater than 0.001). Return to soft diet (LA: 1.4 ± 0.8 days vs OA: 3.0 ± 1.6 days, p greater than 0.001) and time to out of bed (LA: 1.3±0.5 days vs OA: 2.5±0.9 days, p greater than 0.001) was faster in the LA group. The incidence of complications and 30-day readmission rate in the LA group was much lower than the OA group. Conclusion: Emergency LA in treating elderly patients with CA has the advantages of less trauma, definite curative effect, low complication rates, and fast recovery when compared with OA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.