Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29114606›Full record

ArticleAdvances in radiation oncology

Estimating prognosis at the time of repeat whole brain radiation therapy for multiple brain metastases: The reirradiation score.

Natalie Logie, Rachel B Jimenez, Natalie Pulenzas, Kelly Linden, Denise Ciafone, Sunita Ghosh, Yuhui Xu, Shilo Lefresne, Erin Wong, Christina H Son and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in radiation oncology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Natalie LogieDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Cross Cancer Institute, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Rachel B JimenezDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Natalie PulenzasDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Kelly LindenDivision of Radiation Oncology, The Ottawa Hospital and the University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Denise CiafoneDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, Arizona.
Sunita GhoshDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Cross Cancer Institute, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Yuhui XuDivision of Radiation Oncology, The Ottawa Hospital and the University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Shilo LefresneDepartment of Radiation Oncology, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Erin WongDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Christina H SonDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois.
Helen A ShihDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
William W WongDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, Arizona.
Scott TyldesleyDepartment of Radiation Oncology, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Kristopher DennisDivision of Radiation Oncology, The Ottawa Hospital and the University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Edward ChowDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Alysa M FairchildDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Cross Cancer Institute, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeWhole brain radiation therapy (WBRT) remains the standard of care for patients with multiple brain metastases, but more than half of treated patients will develop intracranial progression. Because there is no clear consensus on the optimal therapeutic approach, a prognostic index would be helpful to guide treatment options at progression. We explored whether the recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) score prior to repeat WBRT is predictive of survival. METHODS AND MATERIALS: This multi-institutional pooled analysis included patients with 2 or more brain metastases from any solid primary tumor that was treated with 2 courses of WBRT. Information on demographics, disease characteristics, and intervals between courses was collected. RPA class was abstracted or retrospectively assigned, and descriptive statistics calculated. Median survival (MS) was determined using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using log rank tests. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed via Cox regression analysis.

resultsFor 205 patients, the median age was 55 years (range, 25-83 years), 68% were female, 40.5% had non-small cell lung cancer, and 31.2% had small cell lung cancer. Prior to the second WBRT, 4.9% of patients were RPA class 1, 36.6% were RPA2, and 58.5% were RPA3, with an MS of 7.5 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 4.7-10.3), 5.2 months (95% CI, 3.7-6.7 months), and 2.9 months (95% CI, 2.2-2.9 months), respectively (

conclusionsIn the largest reported cohort to receive repeat WBRT, application of the RPA score was not predictive of MS. The new ReRT score is a simple tool based on readily available clinical information.

Identifiers

PMID29114606
PMCPMC5605302

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.