Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29114601›Full record

ArticleAdvances in radiation oncology

Elective nodal dose of 60 Gy or 50 Gy in head and neck cancers: A matched pair analysis of outcomes and toxicity.

Vedang Murthy, Lavanya Gurram, Sadhana Kannan, Minakshi Gandhi, Tejpal Gupta, Sarbani Ghosh Laskar, Ashwini Budrukkar, Jai Prakash Agarwal

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in radiation oncology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. CSMedJournal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2024
    Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Vedang MurthyDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, India.
Lavanya GurramDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, India.
Sadhana KannanEpidemiology and Clinical Trials Unit, Advanced Centre for Treatment, Research and Education in Cancer (ACTREC), Navi Mumbai, India.
Minakshi GandhiEpidemiology and Clinical Trials Unit, Advanced Centre for Treatment, Research and Education in Cancer (ACTREC), Navi Mumbai, India.
Tejpal GuptaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, India.
Sarbani Ghosh LaskarDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, India.
Ashwini BudrukkarDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, India.
Jai Prakash AgarwalDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, India.
Tata Memorial Hospital · INAdvanced Centre for Treatment, Research and Education in Cancer · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe main objective of this study was to evaluate appropriate doses for elective nodal irradiation (ENI) in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) patients to optimize the therapeutic ratio. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A matched pair analysis of 2 similar cohorts of HNSCC treated with intensity modulated radiation therapy with different dose prescriptions to the elective nodal regions was conducted. One group received 60 Gy, whereas the other received 50 Gy (ENI

resultsOf the 110 patients studied, 97 were eligible for analysis after matching based on propensity scores. The 3-year locoregional control rate was similar in ENI

conclusionsDoses of 50 Gy equivalent are sufficient to sterilize the uninvolved nodal regions because the rates of IRR are extremely low. Using ENI

Identifiers

PMID29114601
PMCPMC5605312
OpenAlexW2710201694

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.