ArticleBiochemistry and biophysics reports2017
Engineering microdent structures of bone implant surfaces to enhance osteogenic activity in MSCs.
Article in Biochemistry and biophysics reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Directional Osteo-Differentiation Effect of hADSCs on Nanotopographical Self-Assembled Polystyrene Nanopit Surfaces.International journal of nanomedicine · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Problems persist with the integration of hip and dental implants with host bone tissues, which may result in long-term implant failure. Previous studies have found that implants bearing irregular surfaces can facilitate osseointegration. An improvement to this approach would use implant surfaces harboring a well-defined surface microstructure to decrease variability in implant surfaces. In this study, we tested whether well-defined surfaces with arrays of microdents (each with depth approximately 3 µm) significantly affected the morphology, proliferation, and osteogenic activity of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs). Arrays of microdents tested had diameters of 9 µm, 12 µm, and 18 µm, while spacing between arrays ranged from 8 µm to 34 µm. Effects on MSC morphology (cell spreading area) and proliferation were also quantified, with both significantly decreasing on micropatterned surfaces (p<0.05) on smaller and denser microdents. In contrast, MSCs were found to deposit more calcified matrix on smaller and denser arrays of microdents. MSCs on a pattern with arrays of microdents with a diameter of 9 µm and a spacing 8 µm deposited 3-4 times more calcified matrix than on a smooth surface (p<0.05). These findings show that well-defined surface microtopographies promote osteogenic activity, which can be used on implant surfaces to improve integration with the host bone tissue.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.