Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29114582›Full record

ArticleBiochemistry and biophysics reports2017

Engineering microdent structures of bone implant surfaces to enhance osteogenic activity in MSCs.

Sophia Li, Thomas Chow, Julia Chu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biochemistry and biophysics reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sophia LiDepartment of Bioengineering and The Center for Tissue Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA.
Thomas ChowDepartment of Bioengineering and The Center for Tissue Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA.
Julia ChuDepartment of Bioengineering and The Center for Tissue Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA.
University of California, Berkeley · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Problems persist with the integration of hip and dental implants with host bone tissues, which may result in long-term implant failure. Previous studies have found that implants bearing irregular surfaces can facilitate osseointegration. An improvement to this approach would use implant surfaces harboring a well-defined surface microstructure to decrease variability in implant surfaces. In this study, we tested whether well-defined surfaces with arrays of microdents (each with depth approximately 3 µm) significantly affected the morphology, proliferation, and osteogenic activity of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs). Arrays of microdents tested had diameters of 9 µm, 12 µm, and 18 µm, while spacing between arrays ranged from 8 µm to 34 µm. Effects on MSC morphology (cell spreading area) and proliferation were also quantified, with both significantly decreasing on micropatterned surfaces (p<0.05) on smaller and denser microdents. In contrast, MSCs were found to deposit more calcified matrix on smaller and denser arrays of microdents. MSCs on a pattern with arrays of microdents with a diameter of 9 µm and a spacing 8 µm deposited 3-4 times more calcified matrix than on a smooth surface (p<0.05). These findings show that well-defined surface microtopographies promote osteogenic activity, which can be used on implant surfaces to improve integration with the host bone tissue.

Indexed as

Bone implantsMesenchymal stem cellsMicrodentsMicropatternsOsteogenic differentiation

Identifiers

PMID29114582
PMCPMC5632706
OpenAlexW2560751836

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.