Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29114456›Full record

ReviewSchizophrenia research. Cognition2015

Disruption of information processing in schizophrenia: The time perspective.

Anne Giersch, Patrick E Poncelet, Rémi L Capa, Brice Martin, Céline Z Duval, Maxime Curzietti, Marc Hoonacker, Mitsouko van Assche, Laurence Lalanne

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Schizophrenia research. Cognition, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. The Temporal Scaffolding of Sensory Organization.Annual review of psychology · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Anne GierschINSERM U1114, Fédération de Médecine Translationnelle de Strasbourg (FMTS), Dept of Psychiatry, University Hospital of Strasbourg; 1, pl de l'Hôpital, 67000 Strasbourg, France.
Patrick E PonceletINSERM U1114, Fédération de Médecine Translationnelle de Strasbourg (FMTS), Dept of Psychiatry, University Hospital of Strasbourg; 1, pl de l'Hôpital, 67000 Strasbourg, France.
Rémi L CapaINSERM U1114, Fédération de Médecine Translationnelle de Strasbourg (FMTS), Dept of Psychiatry, University Hospital of Strasbourg; 1, pl de l'Hôpital, 67000 Strasbourg, France.
Brice MartinCentre Lyonnais Référent en Réhabilitation et en Remédiation cognitive (CL3R) - Service Universitaire de Réhabilitation (SUR), Hôpital du Vinatier, Université Lyon 1 & UMR 5229 (CNRS), France.
Céline Z DuvalINSERM U1114, Fédération de Médecine Translationnelle de Strasbourg (FMTS), Dept of Psychiatry, University Hospital of Strasbourg; 1, pl de l'Hôpital, 67000 Strasbourg, France.
Maxime CurziettiINSERM U1114, Fédération de Médecine Translationnelle de Strasbourg (FMTS), Dept of Psychiatry, University Hospital of Strasbourg; 1, pl de l'Hôpital, 67000 Strasbourg, France.
Marc HoonackerINSERM U1114, Fédération de Médecine Translationnelle de Strasbourg (FMTS), Dept of Psychiatry, University Hospital of Strasbourg; 1, pl de l'Hôpital, 67000 Strasbourg, France.
Mitsouko van AsscheUniversity of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Laurence LalanneINSERM U1114, Fédération de Médecine Translationnelle de Strasbourg (FMTS), Dept of Psychiatry, University Hospital of Strasbourg; 1, pl de l'Hôpital, 67000 Strasbourg, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We review studies suggesting time disorders on both automatic and subjective levels in patients with schizophrenia. Patients have difficulty explicitly discriminating between simultaneous and asynchronous events, and ordering events in time. We discuss the relationship between these difficulties and impairments on a more elementary level. We showed that for undetectable stimulus onset asynchronies below 20 ms, neither patients nor controls merge events in time, as previously believed. On the contrary, subjects implicitly distinguish between events even when evaluating them to be simultaneous. Furthermore, controls privilege the last stimulus, whereas patients seem to stay stuck on the first stimulus when asynchronies are sub-threshold. Combining previous results shows this to be true for patients even for asynchronies as short as 8 ms. Moreover, this peculiarity predicts difficulties with detecting asynchronies longer than 50 ms, suggesting an impact on the conscious ability to time events. Difficulties on the subjective level are also correlated with clinical disorganization. The results are interpreted within the framework of predictive coding which can account for an implicit ability to update events. These results complement a range of other results, by suggesting a difficulty with binding information in time as well as space, and by showing that information processing lacks continuity and stability in patients. The time perspective may help bridge the gap between cognitive impairments and clinical symptoms, by showing how the innermost structure of thought and experience is disrupted.

Indexed as

Implicit processingPredictive codingSchizophreniaSimon effectSynchronyTime

Identifiers

PMID29114456
PMCPMC5609651

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.