Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29114353›Full record

ArticleComparative cytogenetics2017

A chromosomal analysis of

Robert B Angus, Constance Jeangirard, Desislava Stoianova, Snejana Grozeva, Valentina G Kuznetsova

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Comparative cytogenetics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Robert B AngusDepartment of Life Sciences (Insects), The Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD, UK.
Constance JeangirardSchool of Biological Sciences, Royal Holloway University of London, Egham, Surrey TW20 0EX, UK.
Desislava StoianovaInstitute of Biodiversity and Ecosystem Research, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, 1 Tsar Osvoboditel, Sofia 1000, Bulgaria.
Snejana GrozevaInstitute of Biodiversity and Ecosystem Research, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, 1 Tsar Osvoboditel, Sofia 1000, Bulgaria.
Valentina G KuznetsovaZoological Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, Universitetskaya nab. 1, St. Petersburg 199034, Russia.
Institute of Biodiversity and Ecosystem Research · BGNatural History Museum · GBRoyal Holloway University of London · GBZoological Institute · RU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An account is given of the karyotypes and male meiosis of the Water Scorpion

Indexed as

18S rDNAC-bandingFISHHeteropteraKaryotypemale meiosisNepa cinereaNepomorphaRanatra linearis(TTAGG)n

Identifiers

PMID29114353
PMCPMC5672273
OpenAlexW2755165130

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.