Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29114254›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in plant science2017

Accelerated Generation of Selfed Pure Line Plants for Gene Identification and Crop Breeding.

Guijun Yan, Hui Liu, Haibo Wang, Zhanyuan Lu, Yanxia Wang, Daniel Mullan, John Hamblin, Chunji Liu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in plant science, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Association mapping of haploid male fertility in sweet corn.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Guijun YanFaculty of Science, UWA School of Agriculture and Environment, University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia.
Hui LiuFaculty of Science, UWA School of Agriculture and Environment, University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia.
Haibo WangHebei Centre of Plant Genetic Engineering, Institute of Genetics and Physiology, Hebei Academy of Agricultural and Forestry Sciences, Shijiazhuang, China.
Zhanyuan LuInner Mongolia Academy of Agriculture and Animal Husbandry Sciences, Huhhot, China.
Yanxia WangHebei Province Wheat Engineering Technical Research Center, Shijiazhuang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shijiazhuang, China.
Daniel MullanFaculty of Science, UWA School of Agriculture and Environment, University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia.
John HamblinFaculty of Science, UWA School of Agriculture and Environment, University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia.
Chunji LiuFaculty of Science, UWA School of Agriculture and Environment, University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Production of pure lines is an important step in biological studies and breeding of many crop plants. The major types of pure lines for biological studies and breeding include doubled haploid (DH) lines, recombinant inbred lines (RILs), and near isogenic lines (NILs). DH lines can be produced through microspore and megaspore culture followed by chromosome doubling while RILs and NILs can be produced through introgressions or repeated selfing of hybrids. DH approach was developed as a quicker method than conventional method to produce pure lines. However, its drawbacks of genotype-dependency and only a single chance of recombination limited its wider application. A recently developed fast generation cycling system (FGCS) achieved similar times to those of DH for the production of selfed pure lines but is more versatile as it is much less genotype-dependent than DH technology and does not restrict recombination to a single event. The advantages and disadvantages of the technologies and their produced pure line populations for different purposes of biological research and breeding are discussed. The development of a concept of complete

Indexed as

crop breedingdoubled haploid (DH)fast generation cycling system (FGCS)near isogenic lines (NILs)recombinant inbred lines (RILs)selfed pure lines

Identifiers

PMID29114254
PMCPMC5660708

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.